Beyond Convenience: Trust, Risk, and Gender in Shaping Student Adoption of Electronic Payment through a PLS-SEM Lens

Authors

  • Nirmala Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • P. Edi Sumantri Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Endang Sri Wahyuningsih Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Farida Nur Aini Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v6i3.2943

Keywords:

perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, perceived risk, gender, electronic payment, PLS-SEM

Abstract

The rapid shift from cash-based to electronic transactions has made student communities a strategic segment for understanding how digital payment habits take root, yet what pulls a young user toward routine use of such platforms is still debated across studies with mixed findings on trust and risk. This study examines how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, and perceived risk shape electronic payment usage among university students in Banyumas Regency, and whether usage differs between male and female students, drawing on an extended Technology Acceptance Model in which trust and perceived risk complement the benefit-effort logic of the original model and gender is treated as a demographic grouping variable. A closed Likert-scale questionnaire was distributed to active students across several universities in the regency, and the resulting data were processed through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to jointly assess the measurement and structural models. The measurement model met the required thresholds for convergent validity and construct reliability, although the closeness between perceptual constructs and the usage construct warranted a cautious reading of discriminant validity. The structural model confirmed that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and trust each exert a positive and significant influence on electronic payment usage, whereas perceived risk exerts a significant negative influence, and female students report higher usage than male students once these perceptions are held constant. The proposed model explained a substantial share of variance in usage behavior, indicating strong predictive strength. These findings offer payment service providers and university administrators a basis for designing gender-responsive digital financial literacy programs that foreground usability, functional benefit, and risk mitigation to widen electronic payment adoption among young users

References

Aguilar, A., Frost, J., Guerra, R., Kamin, S., & Tombini, A. (2024). Digital payments, informality and economic growth. BIS Working Papers. Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Al-Qudah, A. A., Al-Okaily, M., Shiyyab, F. S., Taha, A. A. D., Almajali, D. A., Masa'deh, R., & Warrad, L. H. (2024). Determinants of digital payment adoption among generation Z: An empirical study. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 521.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110521

Aljaradat, A., & Shukla, S. K. (2025). Trust and cybersecurity in digital payment adoption: Socioeconomic insights from India. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 5, 372-386.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-04-2025-0119

Alrawad, M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Madadha, A., & Al Khasawneh, M. H. (2023). Examining the influence of trust and perceived risk on customers' intention to use NFC mobile payment systems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100070.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100070

Angel-Rodriguez, P., & Vicente-Pascual, J. (2026). Exploring the adoption of mobile payments: A hybrid literature review and future research agenda. Future Business Journal, 12, 40.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00712-6

Apau, R., Titis, E., & Lallie, H. S. (2025). Towards a better understanding of mobile banking app adoption and use: Integrating security, risk, and trust into UTAUT2. Computers, 14, 144.

https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14040144

Arsy, K. M., & Iskamto, D. (2026). The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on intention to use Shopee Paylater with perceived trust as a mediating variable among Generation Z in Bandung City. Journal of Business, Social and Technology, 7(3).

https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i3.682

Ashoer, M., Prawira, M. F. A., & Syamsuddin, N. (2024). The moderating impact of gender differences on the relationship between innovation resistance and mobile financial service adoption. Innovative Marketing, 21(1).

https://doi.org/10.21511/im.21(1).2025.21

Bank Indonesia. (2025). FEKDI x IFSE 2025: Digitalization of the digital economy and finance as a key driver of future economic growth [Press release]. Bank Indonesia.

Chauhan, S., Kumar, P., Gajpal, Y., & Motiwalla, L. (2022). Investigating trust in mobile payment services: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100(20), 6049-6060.

Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India: An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(7), 1590-1618.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256

Chen, S., Doerr, S., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., & Shin, H. S. (2023). The fintech gender gap. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 54, 101026.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2023.101026

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.

https://doi.org/10.2307/249720

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.

https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer International Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hasan, B. (2010). Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 597-601.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.012

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hoque, M. Z., Chowdhury, N. J., Hossain, A. A., & Tabassum, T. (2024). Social and facilitating influences in fintech user intention and the fintech gender gap. Heliyon, 10(1), e23457.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23457

Humbani, M., & Wiese, M. (2019). An integrated framework for the adoption and continuance intention to use mobile payment apps. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(2), 646-664.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2018-0072

Jagrič, V., Tominc, P., & Rožman, M. (2026). Explaining behavioral intention and actual use of digital payment systems: A structural equation modeling approach among university students. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(8), 556.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19080556

Karmaker, S., Oishi, M. L. F., Qasem, A., Sami, S. B. S., & Noor, J. (2025). Exploring influential factors of consumer purchase behavior on the adoption of digital payment apps in Bangladesh. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, 100587.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100587

Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001

Kumala, D. C., Pranata, J. W., & Thio, S. (2020). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, and security on the intention to use GoPay among Generation X in Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Perhotelan, 6(1), 19-29.

https://doi.org/10.9744/jmp.6.1.19-29

Kurnia, R. A., & Tandijaya, T. N. B. (2023). The influence of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, security, and trust on the intention to use the Jago application. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 17(1), 64-72.

https://doi.org/10.9744/jmp.17.1.64-72

Lee, J. N., Morduch, J., Ravindran, S., & Shonchoy, A. S. (2022). Narrowing the gender gap in mobile banking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 193, 276-293.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.005

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

Noer, L. R., Fadhilah, J., Prihananto, P., & Noer, B. A. (2025). Exploring the impact of trust, perceived utility, ease of use perception, and social influence on e-payment adoption. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 16(1), 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v16i1.18667

Nurlaily, F., Aini, E. K., & Asmoro, P. S. (2021). Understanding the fintech continuance intention of Indonesian users: The moderating effect of gender. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 290-298.

https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2021.13880

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, & Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). OJK dan BPS umumkan hasil Survei Nasional Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan tahun 2024 [Joint press release SP 106/OJK/GKPB/VIII/2024]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275

Pierre, S. J., & Mombeuil, C. (2023). Factors affecting merchants' acceptance of P2P m-payments: A multigroup moderating effect of gender, age, and experience. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 41(8), 1919-1944.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2023-0230

Rasheduzzaman, M., Palash, M. S., Mostafizur, R. M., Farid, M. S., & Samria, N. J. (2025). Bridging the gender gap in mobile payment services: Insights from consumers of Bangladesh. Scientific Reports, 15.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06176-6

Samuel, E. G., Ruban, S., Parayitam, S., & Cristofaro, M. (2026). From ease of use to satisfaction: The roles of trust and risk in digital payment adoption. Management Research Review, 49(13), 77-94.

https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2025-0801

Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Measurement and research methods in international marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 22, pp. 195-218). Emerald Group Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012

Siagian, H., Cahyono, E., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2022). The effect of perceived security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 861-874.

https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.010

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

Thanigan, J., Reddy, N. S., Maity, M., Sethuraman, P., & Rajesh, J. I. (2025). An integrated framework for understanding innovative digital payment adoption and continued usage by small offline retailers. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1), 2462442.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2462442

Timur, Y. P., Ridlwan, A. A., Fikriyah, K., Susilowati, F. D., Rofiqo, A., Wijaya, M. W., & Muhammad, A. S. (2026). QRIS as a digital payment: Gender differences and adoption perspectives among Generation Z through multi-group analysis. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1), 2027095.

https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2027095

Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Xavier, M. F., Susainathan, S., Antonymuthu, S. V., Antony, P. J. S., & Parayitam, S. (2024). Deciphering the influence of compatibility, trust, and perceived enjoyment on intention to use digital payments. Journal of Marketing Analytics.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00340-z

Yang, C. C., Yang, S. Y., & Chang, Y. C. (2023). Predicting older adults' mobile payment adoption: An extended TAM model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1391.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021391

Downloads

Published

2026-11-13

How to Cite

Nirmala, P. Edi Sumantri, Endang Sri Wahyuningsih, & Farida Nur Aini. (2026). Beyond Convenience: Trust, Risk, and Gender in Shaping Student Adoption of Electronic Payment through a PLS-SEM Lens. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 6(3), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v6i3.2943

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.