Child Marriage Dispensation and the Paradox of Legal Protection: A Normative Analysis of Judges' Legal Reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v6i1.2346Keywords:
Child Marriage Dispensation, Legal Protection, Judicial ReasoningAbstract
This article examines the practice of child marriage dispensation within the Indonesian marriage law system by highlighting the paradox of legal protection embedded in judicial reasoning. Following the reform of the minimum marriage age under Law Number 16 of 2019, the study aims to analyze whether the dispensation mechanism is applied consistently with the objective of child protection. Employing a normative legal research approach, this study analyzes statutory regulations, child protection principles, and the structure of judicial reasoning in court decisions granting child marriage dispensation. The findings reveal that although child protection is normatively acknowledged, judicial practice tends to prioritize short-term pragmatic and social considerations, thereby weakening the preventive function of the minimum marriage age norm. Judicial reasoning frequently normalizes dispensation as an expedient solution, resulting in a shift from substantive child protection to a formal-procedural approach. This article concludes that strengthening child protection in child marriage dispensation cases requires a reorientation of judicial reasoning that consistently places the best interests of the child as the primary evaluative standard and substantive objective in judicial decision-making
References
Abdelkarim, Y. A. (2025). Judicial Reasoning as a Mechanism for the Legal Protection of Children Against Digital Sexual Abuse and Child Pornography. 203–221.
Abiansyah, Y., & Putra, D. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Seorang Anak Sebagai Pemohon Dispensasi Kawin Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Perkawinan. 5(1), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2403
Aditya, R. I., & Waddington, L. (2021). Bestuur. 9(2), 126–134.
Aji, B. (2016). Penerapan Hukum Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Untuk Menjatuhkan Putusan Dalam Perkara Pidana Terhadap Korban Anak Application of Law in Consideration of Judges For Delivering Decisions in Criminal Cases Against Child Victims Jurnal Magister Hukum “ Law and Humanity ” 108-129. 20, 108–129.
Anwar, M., & Wijaya, M. R. (2019). Fungsionalisasi dan Implikasi Asas Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak yang Berkon fl ik dengan Hukum : Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang * Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Lampung. 2(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.265-292
Arda, R., Pradima, T., Bilqis, Z. M., Fadilah, A. A., Tangerang, U. M., & Manusia, H. A. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia bagi perkembangan perlindungan anak di Indonesia . Universal Declaration of Human Rights pada tahun 1948 menjadi dasar Convention Of The Right Of a Child , namun konvensi perlu dianalisis lebih baik , hal ini dimaksudkan Sehingga pemerintah saat itu dianggap tergesa-gesa dalam meratifikasi Convention Of The Right of a Child , hal ini dapat dilihat dari ketersediaan fasilitas , perangkat pendukung dan. 6(6), 277–285.
Asni, A. (2019). Urgensi Sinkronisisasi Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia Perspektif Perlindungan Perempuan Dan Anak. Jurnal Sipakalebbi, 3(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/10.24252/jsipakallebbi.v3i2.11896
Basqina, R., & Jaelani, E. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Child Protection Convention 1996 dan Perbandingannya dengan Undang-Undang No . 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak di Indonesia. 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v2i2.672
Dağ, H. (2021). A Child Abuse : Marriage at Childhood Age. 56(6), 548–552.
Elisabeth, D. (2025). Legal Analysis of Post-Divorce Child Protection Rights ( Case Study : Decision No . 3 / Pdt . G / 2025 / PTA . Smd ). 4(2), 153–164.
Fakhria, S. (2021). PENERAPAN ASAS KEPENTINGAN TERBAIK ANAK: TELAAH IJTIHAD HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM PUTUSAN HAK ASUH ANAK Sheila Fakhria.
Fauziyah, N. S., Fawzi, R., & Rojak, E. A. (2019). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penolakan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin dengan Alasan Menghindari Zina. 5.
Grijns, M. (2018). Child Marriage in a Village in West Java ( Indonesia ): Compromises between Legal Obligations and Religious Concerns. 5(March), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.9
Hamid, A., Iska, S., & Yunarti, S. (2021). Tinjauan Filosofis terhadap Perubahan Batas Usia Perkawinan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019. 19(1), 16–26.
Hariyanto, E., & Efendi, M. (2021). Dilema Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Hukum Keluarga Melalui Mediasi. 4(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4245
Horii, H. (2020). Legal Reasoning for Legitimation of Child Marriage in West Java : Accommodation of Local Norms at Islamic Courts and the Paradox of Child Protection. November, 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa041
Ismail, L. O. (2022). Pernikahan Dini dan Dampaknya Tinjauan Batas Umur Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perkawinan. 12(September), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v12i2.350
Kaha, H., Asfi, A., & Al, M. (2023). Judges ’ Decisions as a Source of Family Law : Case Studies in Indonesia and Malaysia. 2, 62–69.
Katamsyah, J., & Songgirin, A. (2025). Judicial Reasoning in Cumulative Divorce and Child Custody Cases Involving Financial Neglect : A Case Study of Decision No . 5139 / Pdt . G / 2020 / PA . Tgrs. 2(5139), 26–35.
Kilkelly, U., & Pleysier, S. (2023). Rights of the Child in the Child Justice System. 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254231185820
Law, C., Thalib, P. A., & Latumeten, P. E. (2025). Legal Problems of Minor Marriage in the Perspective of Customary ,. 4(7), 1035–1051.
Lintas, L., Anggid, R., Utoro, B., & Pakendek, A. (n.d.). Restorative Justice dalam Kasus Anak Pelanggar. 22.
Løvlie, A. G. (2025). Dilemmas of children ’ s participation and the role of practice guidelines : the views of judicial decision-makers in Norway. i.
Mayasari, D. E. (2020). Legal Protection of Child ’ s Rights Who Conducts of Marriage. 14(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1862
Muchsin, A. (2023). Eksploitasi Seksual Terhadap Anak Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana Islam Sexual Exploitation of Children Reviewed From Islamic Criminal Law. 3(65), 11–27.
Muslimin, A., Setiawan, A., & Dimyati, M. (2021). 1, 2, 3, 4. 3(Marilang 2018).
Mutakin, A. (2022). ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM manusia dimana perkawinan menimbulkan akibat-akibat ikatan lahir batin suami dan istri untuk membentuk. 1(1), 45–68.
Nadia, S., Abd, B., & Idrees, R. Q. (2021). Child Marriages : International Laws and Islamic Laws Perspective. 60–70.
Nafis, H. (2024). PERNIKAHAN DINI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN ( Studi Penelitian Pada Mahkamah Syar ’ iyah Lhokseumawe ). VII.
Naifa, A., & Izadi, F. F. (n.d.). Objek Perjanjian Perkawinan Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Fiqih Pernikahan.
Najib, M. A. (2023). Keragaman Kaidah Dharar Sebagai Landasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin ; Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 82 / Pdt . P / 2023 / PA . Pmk The diversity of dharar rules as a basis for judges in deciding applications for marriage dispensation ; case verdict study no . 82 / rev . p / 2023 / pa . Pmk. 02(01), 59–71.
Nasution, K., Nasution, S., Kalijaga, S., & Kasim, S. S. (2021). IMPLEMENTATION OF INDONESIAN ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW TO GUARANTEE CHILDREN ’ S. 59(2), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.347-374
Nasution, M. I., Syukri, M., Nasution, A., & Information, A. (2021). Kuasa Anak atas Perkawinan: Harmonisasi Perlindungan Anak dan Doktrin Fikih dalam Putusan Dispensasi Kawin. 16(2), 253–268.
Nikah, D., Kasus, S., Pdt, N., & Tarutung, P. P. N. (2024). Jurnal Hukum Legalita Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Permohonan. 6.
Rahayuningsih, U., Hikmah, A. N., & Nurcahyati, S. (2025). Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Perlindungan Hukum Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana : Menyeimbangkan Keadilan dan Pembinaan. 2(April).
Rahim, F. A., & Zurnetti, A. (2020). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Legal Certainty in Judge ’ s Decision Against Perpetubuhananak Criminal Actors Sentenced to Prison Under Special Minimum Limits ( Case Study Number 38 / Pid . Sus / 2019 / Pn Pdg ). 38, 526–539.
Ramadhani, D. A., & Sakti, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Pengembangan Diri Anak Akibat Dispensasi Perkawinan. 5(2), 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2816
Reza, M. F., & Zahara, F. (2024). Judicial Considerations in Granting and Rejecting Child Māḍiyah Support Claims from a Progressive Legal Theory Perspective ( A Normative Juridical Study of Decision No . 1172 / Pdt . G / 2018 / PA . Smd . and Decision No . 41 / Pdt . G / 2014 / PA Tkl .). 4(6), 2314–2325.
Santosa, T. A., Nila, M., Dewi, K., & Ghoni, A. (2025). Juvenile Justice Reform and the Principle of Best Interests of the Child : A Global Legal Perspective. 4(2), 5963–5968.
Sayuti, G. (2023). JURNAL BIDANG HUKUM ISLAM THE JUDGE ’ S CONSIDERATIONS IN DETERMINING MARRIAGE DISPENSATIONS FOR MINOR CHILDREN IN THE BANGKO RELIGIOUS JURNAL BIDANG HUKUM ISLAM, 506–5164 (3),. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v4i3.1111.PENDAHULUAN
Sebriyani, Y. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Perceraian Menurut Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam. 5(2), 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3822
Sulistyarini, R. (2022). RASIO LEGIS PENGATURAN BATAS MINIMAL USIA PERKAWINAN MENURUT UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN. 135–159.
Syifa, L. (2025). Analysis of the Best Interest Principle for Children in Custody Disputes Between Biological Mothers and Foster Mothers. 3(2), 129–150.
Tan, W., Agustianto, A., & Jaya, F. (2024). Legal Dilemma between Law on Protection Child and Marriage Law in Addressing Early Marriage. 10(May), 396–404.
Tanja, S. (2019). SPECIALIZATION OF JUDGES FOR SETTLEMENT OF MARRIAGE DISPUTES. 15–28.
Wahyudi, M. I. (2017). JUDGES ’ LEGAL REASONING ON CHILD PROTECTION Analysis of Religious Courts ’ Decisions on the Case of Child Parentage. 55(1), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.551.127-154
Wahyuningsih, Y. Y., Joesoef, I. E., Desi, D., & Tarina, Y. (2025). Sosialisasi Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Socialization of Law Number 16 of 2019 Amendment to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage 1-5. 5(September).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Atika, Iksan, Zuhrah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
