Dynamic Governance Bureaucracy Model for Combating Abuse of Authority: Challenges at Class IIA Curup Correctional Facility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v6i1.2334Keywords:
bureaucracy model, dynamic governance, abuse of authorityAbstract
This study analyzes the legal concept of abuse of authority and examines how innovative and adaptive policy practices are a form of dynamic governance approach model in the implementation of governance in the class IIA Curup correctional institution, Rejang Lebong Regency, Bengkulu. This study is a qualitative research with a literature review approach by analyzing studies related to the dynamic governance bureaucracy model and theories of abuse of authority in several journals that have been published. The results of this study explain that the abuse of authority was born because of the paradigm that considers the concept of abuse of authority cannot be completely separated from the perspective of criminal law, because authority is a core concept in the study of administrative law. This creates a gap for many parties to commit acts of abuse of authority, which in fact administrative law and related criminal laws related to the abuse of authority are complementary instruments and do not need to be opposed. Then, the dynamic governance bureaucracy model that can reduce the space for abuse of authority can be in the form of: 1) Presenting a harmonized understanding of laws and regulations on "Abuse of Authority" as complementary instruments; 2) Preparing comprehensive strategies related to political leadership, harmonization of public policies, and the use of system merits; 3) Flexible decision-making; 4) Thinking across borders by adopting policies that can be internalized in the prison environment; 5) Building an innovation ecosystem in communication; 6) Encourage the birth of policies that are more adaptive with Performance Agreements (PK) and Integrity Pacts 7) Policies with risk management, especially the safety and health of inmates.
References
Aditio, B., & Finaldi, A. (2025). Hubungan Diskresi dengan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dalam Perspektif Street-Level Bureaucracy. 2(November). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1302
Alim, B.N. (2022). Upaya Mewujudkan Dynamic Governance Pada Pelayanan Publik Di Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Dialogue: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 4(2). https://doi.org/B. N. Alim, 2022. Upaya Mewujudkan Dynamic Governance Pada Pelayanan Publik Di Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Dialogue: Jurhttps://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v4i2.14645
Arifin, T., & Moonti, R. M. (2021). The Authority of Government Officials in Delegating and Mandating. Unnes Law Journal, 7(1), Article 38705. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-4250
Atmaja, S. S., & Pangestuti, N. (2025). Prevention of Abuse of Authority: An Analysis of Integrity at Correctional Facilities. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 13(2), 1841. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v13i2.1841
Afrizal, R., Kurniawan, I., & Wahyudi, F. (2023). Strengthening the Position of Correctional Facilities in the Integrated Criminal Justice System Through the Detainee Service Function. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.1-12
Baihaki, M. R. (2023). Penilaian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang (Detournement De Pouvoir) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(1), 100–122.
Barra, C., & Marcello, P. (2025). Institutional factors and environmental performance : Insights from global economies. Economic Systems, xxxx. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2025.101364
Budiman, S., Junriana, J., & Matridi, R. A. (2022). An Analysis of Dynamic Governance Capability in Innovation Development in Bintan Regency. Aristo, 10(3), 513–537. https://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/aristo/article/view/SBRJM%0Ahttps://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/aristo/article/download/SBRJM/2451
Colm, L., Ordanini, A., & Bornemann, T. (2020). Dynamic Governance Matching in Solution Development. Journal of Marketing, 84(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919879420
Criado, J. I., Guevara-Gómez, A., & Villodre, J. (2021). Digital transformation in justice and public administration: Accountability, transparency and traceability in the digital era. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101599
Dewi, A. (2019). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i1.4
Elvegård, K. (2025). Why train ? Compatible and incompatible institutional logics in violence prevention and management training. Safety Science, 182(June 2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106711
Endang, M. I. A. (2018). Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Discretion And Responsbility Of Government Officials Based On Law Of State Administration. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.122018.223-244
Failin. (2023). Disertasi: Rekonstruksi Regulasi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Narapidana Residivis Perempuan Dalam Pembinaan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Disertasi. Program doktor (s3) Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Guslan, O. F. (2018). “Batasan Antara Perbuatan Maladministrasi dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Riau Law Journal, 2(2), 140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v2i2.4942
Hassel, H., Cedergren, A., & Tehler, H. (2022). Strategies for aggregating risk information in a societal safety context. Safety Science, 149(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105691
Hutahaean, M., & Pasaribu, J. (2022). Bureaucratic Reform and Changes in Public Service Paradigm Post-Decentralization in Indonesia: 2001-2010. KnE Social Sciences, 2022(25), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i5.10595
Ikhsan, K., Samin, R., Akhyary, E., Negara, I. A., Maritim, U., Ali, R., Publik, M. P., Ahead, T., Again, T., & Across, T. (2020). Implementasi Dynamic Governance Dalam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(3), 385–401. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/dinamika/article/view/3561
Kalesaran, M. (2021). Penerapan Sistem Merit Menuju Pemerintahan yang Terpercaya (Trustworthy Government) (Studi Penelitian pada Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara). Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa, VI(01), 1–23.
Kamil, M., Roziqin, A., & Rahmawati, Y. (2023). Dynamic Governance Model Within Integrated Waste Management In Malang City: Agile People And Process In Action. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 12(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.123140
Karandish, F., Liu, S., & Graaf, I. De. (2025). Global groundwater sustainability : A critical review of strategies and future pathways. Journal of Hydrology Journal, 657(March). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133060
Kasim, A. (2013). Bureaucratic Reform and Dynamic Goernance for Combating Corruption: The Challenge for Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v20i1.1862
Klein, B., Mullard, S., Ahamadi, K., Mara, P., Mena, J., Nourdine, S., Rakoto, M., Tombozandry, D., & Maraina, A. V. (2023). ( Re ) Interpreting corruption in local environments : Disputed definitions , contested conservation , and power plays in Northern Madagascar. Political Geography, 107(September). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102973
Koroso, N. H., & Zevenbergen, J. A. (2024). Urban land management under rapid urbanization : Exploring the link between urban land policies and urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia. Cities, 153(September 2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105269
Manao, D. F. (2018). Penyelesaian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang oleh Aparatur Pemerintah Dari Segi Hukum Administrasi Dihubungkan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v2i1.158
Mkhize, N. (2025). Plans without action ? Politics and institutional challenges of anti-corruption reforms in the BRICS countries. Journal of Economic Criminology Journal, 10(September). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100197
OECD. (2021). Public integrity and adaptive governance: Strengthening accountability and risk management in public institutions. OECD Public Governance Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1787/1f3f8e7c-en
Pahmi, N. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sanksi Bagi Petugas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Yang Mengedarkan Narkotika Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 Tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri SIPIL. Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB.
Paranata, A. (2022). The miracle of anti-corruption efforts and regional fiscal independence in plugging budget leakage : evidence from western and eastern Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(August 2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11153
Pratama, J. P., Lita Tyesta A.L.W., & Pinilih, S. A. G. (2022). Eksistensi Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri terhadap Peraturan Daerah dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1947
Priyowidodo, G., Indrayani, I. I., & Yogatama, A. (2024). Smart government-based governance through digital transformation of public services: Experience of Surabaya City Government, Indonesia. PERSPEKTIF, 13(4), 1176–1186. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v13i4.12001
Purwanto, B. A., Putri, T. S., Indrayani, E., & Abrory, Y. (2025). Governance Innovation Through SiMAWAS: Impact Analysis and Service Enhancement for Strengthening Internal Supervision. Jurnal Bina Praja, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.17.2025-2671
Puhi, O., Akili, R. H., & Moonti, R. M. (2020). The Settlement of Abuse of Authority by Government Officials. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v2i1.37323
Rahman, A., & Bakri, R. (2019). Penataan Pengelolaan Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) melalui Dynamic Governance. Jurnal Konstituen, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33701/jk.v1i1.309
Rahmatunnisa, M. (2019). Dialektika Konsep Dynamic Governance. Jurnal Academia Praja, 2(02). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v2i02.116
Rauzi, F., & Sukarno. (2020). Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bagi Calon Advokat Perkumpulan Penasihat Dan Konsultan Hukum Indonesia Cabang Mataram. JILPI: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Dan Inovasi, 1(1), 1–12.
Rauzi, F., & Suriadiata, I. (2024). Legal Sources of Abuse of Authority in Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. Fathur Rauzi Dan Irpan Media of Law and Sharia., 5(3), 324–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v5i4.174
Rahmat, B., Hartanto, B., & Hilman, A. (2024). Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia: From “Public Administration" to "Public Management." Journal of Local Government Issues, 7(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v7i2.33848
Rini, N. S. (2018). Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Administrasi Dalam Undang Undang Tindak Pidana Ko-rupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(2), 267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.257-274
Rustanto, A. E., Sandjaya, T., & Andayani, W. (2023). The Governance Reform In The Coaching Services Of Prisoners In The Correction Centers (A Study At The Sukamiskin Class I Correction Center). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 6(2), 240. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.45232
Santos, B. V. D. S. (2018). Law and Democracy: (Mis) Trusting the Global Reform of Courts in Globalizing Institutions. Routledge, 53–84.
Sari, A. I., & Rusli, Z. (2022). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Dinamis (Dynamic Governance) Dalam Penyelenggaraan Kota Layak Anak Di Kota Pekanbaru. Saraq Opat: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 022–032. https://doi.org/10.55542/saraqopat.v5i1.442
Sarker, A. E., & Rahman, M. H. (2022). Risk-based public sector governance and adaptive management in developing countries. Public Organization Review, 22(3), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00568-4
Setiawan, I., Sururama, R., & Nurdin, I. (2022). Implementasi Kebijakan Penyederhanaan Organisasi di Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. Jurnal Terapan Pemerintahan Minangkabau, 2(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtpm.v2i1.2380
Simanjuntak, E. P. (2018). Pengujian Ada Tidaknya Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Examination To Determine the Presence or Absence of Abuse of Authority According To Government Administration Law. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.237-262
Skarlatidou, A., Haklay, M., Hoyte, S., Oudheusden, M. Van, & Bishop, J. (2024). How can bottom-up citizen science restore public trust in environmental governance and sciences ? Recommendations from three case studies. Environmental Science and Policy, 160(July). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103854 Received
Spasić, D., & Denčić-Mihajlov, K. (2014). Transparency of Financial Reporting in Serbia – Regulatory Framework and Reporting Practices. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9(Ebeec 2013), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00016-1
Triatmanto, B., & Bawono, S. (2023). The interplay of corruption, human capital, and unemployment in Indonesia: Implications for economic development. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2(September). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100031 Received
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Wastuhana, Y., & Werdiningsih, R. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi Era Informasi Teknologi. Jurnal Media Administrasi, 3(1), 8–15.
Widiyastomo, R. P. (2020). Percepatan Implementasi Reformasi Birokrasi Di Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Periode Tahun 2020 - 2024. MIMBAR ADMINISTRASI FISIP UNTAG Semarang, 17(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v17i2.1781
Widowati, L., Setyowati, K., & Suharto, D. G. (2023). Dynamic Governance As Perspective in Indonesian Bureaucracy Reform: Qualitative Analysis of Indonesian Bureaucracy Reform Based on Dynamic Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.403-415
Wiranata, I. G. A. (2022). Diskresi dan Kebijakan Publik: Analisis Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 52(2), 1-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Herisistam, Siti Aisyah, Sedarmayanti, Aziz Sanapiah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
