Problematika Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian dalam Prespektif Lawrence Friedman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v4i3.1606Keywords:
Child Support, Divorce, Lawrence FriedmanAbstract
This article discusses the execution of divorce decisions related to the fulfillment of child support after divorce, analyzed through the perspective of law enforcement according to Lawrence Friedman. The main focus is on how the legal system affects the implementation of child support obligations and the factors that influence its effectiveness. Using Friedman's three-element legal system theoretical framework—legal structure, substance, and culture—this article explores the obstacles and potential solutions in enforcing court decisions. The results of the analysis show that obstacles in the legal structure and community culture often hinder the implementation of child support obligations, even though the legal substance is adequate. Therefore, reforms in the legal system and increased public legal awareness are needed to ensure the welfare of children after divorce.
References
Azizi, Alfian Qodri Azizi. 2020. ‘Sanksi Pengabaian Hak Alimentasi Anak: Perspektif Fiqh dan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia’. Iqtisad Reconstruction of justice and welfare for Indonesia 7(1). doi: 10.31942/iq.v7i1.3455.
Balikpapan, Pengadilan Agama. 2024. ‘Direktori Putusan’. Retrieved 7 November 2024 (https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/pengadilan/profil/pengadilan/pa-balikpapan).
choiri, A. 2024. ‘Penjaminan Harta Ayah Terhadap Kelalaian Pembayaran Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian | Oleh : Dr.H.A.Choiri,SH.,MH. (28/10) - Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama’. Retrieved 10 November 2024 (https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/penjaminan-harta-ayah-terhadap-kelalaian-pembayaran-nafkah-anak-pasca-perceraian-oleh-dr-h-a-choiri-sh-mh-28-10).
Darmawan, Aldy. 2022. ‘Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian’. Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7 No 1.
Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum -. 2017. ‘Delapan Nilai Mahkamah Agung’. Retrieved 10 November 2024 (https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/tentang-badilum/delapan-nilai-mahkamah-agung.html).
efendi, jonaidi. 2018. Metode Penelitian Hukum : Normatif Dan Empiris. Vol. 2. Depok: PrenadamediaGroup.
Huda, F. H., Dea, L. F., & Utama, F. (2023). Single Parent Parenting in Developing Social Emotional of 4-5 Years Old Children. Bulletin of Early Childhood, 2(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.51278/bec.v2i2.1113
Hukumonline, Tim. 2024. ‘Makna Equality Before the Law Dan Penerapannya’. Retrieved 10 November 2024 (https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/equality-before-the-law-lt61a6d5afef049/).
Itansyah, Mohammad Riko, and Siti Ngaisah. 2022. ‘NAFKAH ORANGTUA TERHADAP ANAK SETELAH PUTUSAN CERAI: (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR 822/PDT. G/2020/PA MARTAPURA)’. Judiciary (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan) 87–90.
Kharisma, Bintang Ulya. 2023. ‘PRINCIPLES OF MAKING DIVORCE DIFFICULT BASED ON SEMA 1/2022’. 12(1).
Kitno, Erisa Ardika Prasada, and Yessy Meryantika Sari. 2023. ‘PEMENUHAN NAFKAH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN ORANG TUA (Studi Kasus Di Desa Secondong Kecamatan Pampangan Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir)’. Jurnal Hukum Uniski 12(2):164–75.
Lesmana, CSA TEDDY. 2021. ‘Pokok-Pokok Pikiran Lawrence Meir Friedman; Sistem Hukum Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Sosial - Nusa Putra University’. Retrieved 9 August 2024 (https://nusaputra.ac.id/article/pokok-pokok-pikiran-lawrence-meir-friedman-sistem-hukum-dalam-perspektif-ilmu-sosial/).
lubis, Zulkarnain. 2017. ‘Paradigma Makna Perceraian | Oleh : Drs. Zulkarnain Lubis, M.H. (11/7) - Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama’. Retrieved 5 November 2024 (https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/paradigma-makna-perceraian-oleh-drs-zulkarnain-lubis-m-h-11-7).
Marzuki, pieter. 2023. Penelitian Hukum. Vol. 18. revisi. Prenada Media.
Media, Kompas Cyber. 2022. ‘Sistem Kekerabatan Suku di Indonesia: Parental, Patrilineal, dan Matrilineal Halaman all’. KOMPAS.com. Retrieved 10 November 2024 (https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/07/182256378/sistem-kekerabatan-suku-di-indonesia-parental-patrilineal-dan-matrilineal).
Muqoddas, Busyro. 2002. ‘Mengkritisi Asas-Asas Hukum Acara Perdata’. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 9(20):18–31. doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art2.
PA Tanjung, PA Tanjung. 2018. ‘Nafkah Dalam Bingkai Islam’. Retrieved 6 November 2024 (https://pa-tanjung.go.id/127-artikel/414-nafkah-dalam-bingkai-islam.html).
Pradinie T ST M.eng, Karina. n.d. ‘Teknik Analisa Kualitatif PPT | PDF’. Retrieved 19 June 2024 (https://www.scribd.com/presentation/615612068/Teknik-Analisa-Kualitatif-ppt).
Pratiwi, Rufia Wahyuning. 2020. ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kelalaian Pemenuhan Pembayaran Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Blitar’. Negara Dan Keadilan 9(1):50–61.
Soesilo, R. 1995. RIB/HIR Dengan Penjelasan. Bogor: Politeia.
Solihandracem, Solihandracem, Muhammad Hasbi, and Yasniwati Yasniwati. 2023. ‘Pelaksanaan Pemberian Nafkah Anak Berdasarkan Putusan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Padang’. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 7(3):925–37. doi: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i3.390.
Subaidi. 2014. ‘KONSEP NAFKAH MENURUT HUKUM PERKAWINAN ISLAM’. ISTI’DAL; Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 1, No. 2.
Super User. 2024. ‘7 Nilai-Nilai Utama Badan Peradilan’. Retrieved 10 November 2024 (https://www.pn-bantul.go.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=503&Itemid=532).
Suratman, Philips Dillah. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum. 4th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Wahyuni, Lilik Andar Yuni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
