Tantangan dan Prospek dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional: Sebuah Tinjauan Hukum Globalisasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v4i1.1291Keywords:
International Dispute Resolution, International Law, GlobalizationAbstract
The phenomenon of globalization introduces new complexities in international dispute resolution, expanding inter-state interactions but also presenting new challenges such as transnational crimes and environmental issues. This study aims to identify and analyze these challenges and seek effective solutions within the existing legal framework. The method used is descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach, focusing on literature review. The findings suggest that enhanced international cooperation and the strengthening of international law can help overcome challenges in international dispute resolution, promoting global peace and justice. The prospect of resolving international disputes using a global legal approach is very promising in the complex era of globalization. Strengthening diplomacy and negotiations, use of international dispute resolution mechanisms, and collaboration with non-state actors are important steps to achieve a just and peaceful resolution.
Keywords: International Dispute Resolution, International Law, Globalization
References
Armansyah. 2021. “Online Dispute Resolution Sebagai Alternatif Pemyeelsaian Sengketa Transaksi Digital.” Selisik 7(2):34–52.
Brownlie, Ian. 2008. Principles of Public International Law. edited by Oxford University Press. United states.
C. N, Novitasari. 2021. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Internasional Dalam Kasus Sengketa Indonesia-Malaysia Mengenai Pulau Sipadan Dan Ligitan.” The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 2(2), 231-262.
Haula Adolf. 2020. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta Timur.
Herlina, Umar Mubdi, and Arief Sempurno. 2023. “Enhancing ADR through Collaborative Clinical Legal EAducation : Law Schools and BANI’s Optimized Partnership in Indonesia.” 5:247–72.
Jonaedi, Efendi, and Ibrahim Jhonny. 2016. Metode Penelitian Hukum : Normatif Dan Empiris. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana.
Keohane, Robert O., and Josepdg S.Nye. 2017. Power and Interdependence. Vol. 6.
Lee, Jong Wha. 2020. “Comments on ‘US–Japan Trade Frictions: The Past, the Present and Implications for US–China Trade War.’” Asian Economic Policy Review 15(1):162–63. doi: 10.1111/aepr.12285.
Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika. 2012. “Suatu Kajian Umum Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional Termasuk Di Dalam Tubuh Asean.” Perspektif 17(3):150. doi: 10.30742/perspektif.v17i3.104.
Margolang, Fahmi Ihsan, Rahma Zahrani, Syara Sapriliani, and Taufik Mushlih. 2024. “Harmoni Multikultutral : Keragaman Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Asean, Uni Eropa Dan Liga Arab.” Jurnal El Qanuniy 10(1):153–69.
Michael E. Smith. 2004. Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation. New York: Cambride university press.
N. S, Tomayahu. 2020. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional Dengan Menggunakan Metode Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Rafat Ali V Republik Indonesia) Di ICSID.” Jurnal Al Himayah, 4(1), 90-117.
N, Rudi. 2018. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional.
Nugroho, Yoga Subekti. 2024. “Tantangan Dan Prospek Pengembangan Arbitrase Online Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Era Digital.” IJESPG Journal : International Journal of Engineering , Economic, Social Politc and Goverment. 2(1):58–69.
Peter Malanczuk. 1997. Modern Introduction to International Law. USA and Canada: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
Smeets, Maarten. 2018. “Can Economic Sanctions Be Effective?” WTO Staff Working Paper.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Saumi Triutami, Riyadi Solihin, Widi Wijayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
