“You Must Attend to My Wedding Party”: The Power of Punjungan as a Symbol of Wedding Invitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/anglophile.v2i2.302Keywords:
Pierces Semiotics Analysis, Punjungan as Symbol, Analysis of SemioticAbstract
Punjungan is a tradition of giving meals to the neighbor for expressing gratitude. It had been happened for long time, however this tradition is still applied by Javanese in Indonesia. Moreover, It is also implemented by Javanese who live in Central Lampung. This research aims at revealing the values of the punjungan and the consequences of this custom among the community. Moreover, this study used Pierces’ Semiotics analysis and the theory of gift by Strauss. It is descriptive qualitative research that used interview and observation as the way to collecting data. Then, the data analyzed interactively. The data obtained from respondent of central Lampung citizen especially Sritejokencono village. It was found that the tradition is still applied and has a function as an invitation that has consequences for the receiver to attend the invitation. This research is useful for the society in order to avoid miscommunication among them.
Keywords: Pierces Semiotics Analysis, Punjungan as Symbol, Analysis of Semiotic
References
Almanna, A., & Al-Shehari, K. (2018). The Arabic-English Translator as Photographer: A Linguistic Account. Routledge.
Anisah, A. (2019). Pergeseran nilai Tradisi Munjung dalam Pernikahan (Studi di Desa Nglinduk Kecamatan Gabus Kabupaten Grobogan)—Walisongo Repository [UIN Walisongo]. http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/11149/
Belba?, A. G. (2020). Exploring the Gift-Giving Rituals of the New Middle-Class Consumers in a Muslim Society. In Marketization (pp. 75–96). Springer.
Bronner, S. J. (2000). The Meaning of Tradition: An Introduction. Western Folklore, 59(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/1500154
Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Zorn, T. E., & Ganesh, S. (2004). Organizational Communication in an Age of Globalization: Issues, Reflections, Practices. Waveland Press.
Clowes, R. (2007). Semiotic symbols and the missing theory of thinking. Interaction Studies, 8(1), 105–124.
Cobley, P. (2014). Introducing semiotics: A graphic guide. Icon Books Ltd.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In The systems model of creativity (pp. 47–61). Springer.
Deledalle, G. (2001). Charles S. Peirce’s philosophy of signs: Essays in comparative semiotics.Indiana University Press.
Emmons, R. A., & Kneezel, T. T. (2005). Giving thanks: Spiritual and religious. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 24(2), 140–148.
Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S. (2013). How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367.
Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to Communication Studies.Routledge.
Fourie, P. J. (2001). Media Studies: Institutions, theories, and issues. Juta and Company Ltd.
Gehrt, K. C., & Shim, S. (2002). Situational influcence in the internationa marketplace: An examination of Japanese gift-giving. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(1), 11–22.
Giesler, M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 283–290. Gofman, A. (1998). A vague but suggestive concept: The total social fact. Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute, 63–70.
Gravells, J. (2016). Semiotics and Verbal Texts: How the News Media Construct a Crisis. Springer.
Gupta, A. K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P., Patel, H., Patel, K., Chand,S., & James, T. J. (2003). Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: Articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35(9), 975–987.
Hasyim, S., & Nuryatin, A. (2018). Educational Values in the Novel Trilogy “Sepatu Dahlan, Surat Dahlan, dan Senyum Dahlan” by Khrisna Pabichara. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 122–130.
Hans, A., & Hans, E. (2015). Kinesics, haptics and proxemics: Aspects of non-verbal communication. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(2), 47-52.
Hébert, L. (2019). An Introduction to Applied Semiotics: Tools for Text and Image Analysis.Routledge.
Jones, D., Wirth, J. M., & Schwartz, M. (2009). The Gift of Logos: Essays in Continental Philosophy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kennedy, W. J. (2016). Petrarchism at Work: Contextual Economies in the Age of Shakespeare. Cornell University Press.
Kralemann, B., & Lattmann, C. (2013). Models as icons: Modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese, 190(16), 3397–3420.
Leonardo: Journal of International Society for the Arts, Sciences and Technology. (2002).Pergamon Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1997). Selections from Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss. New York: Routledge.
Lupitasari, D., & Jalil, A. (2016). Tradisi munjung di dalam pesta pernikahan adat jawa di desa air panas kecamatan pendalian iv koto kabupaten rokan hulu. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 1–15.
Mahfudziah, M., Yarmaidi, Y., & Suwarni, N. (2013). Persepsi masyarakat jawa terhadap tradisi punjungan (No. 6). 1(6), Article 6.http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpg/article/view/2968
Marfo, C., Opoku-Agyeman, K., & Nsiah, J. (2015). Symbols of communication: The case of
Àdì?krá and other symbols of Akan. Language, Society, and Culture, 32, 63-71.
Nurhadi, Z. F., & Kurniawan, A. W. (2017). Kajian tentang efektivitas pesan dalam komunikasi. 3(1), 6.
Obeng, S. G. (2006). From Linguistics to Cultural Anthropology: Aspects of Language, Culture and Family Issues in Ghana (West Africa). Lincom Europa.
Otto, T., & Pedersen, P. (2005). Tradition and Agency: Tracing Cultural Continuity and Invention. ISD LLC.
Philippe Chanial. (2014). The Gift and Care | Revue du Mauss permanente. http://www.journaldumauss.net/?The-Gift-and-Care-1129
Pyyhtinen, O. (2016). The Gift and its Paradoxes: Beyond Mauss. Routledge.
Rammal, H. G. (2017). Communicating successfully: The importance of nonverbal messages in the communication process. Samadhan-The Solution, 10, 21-26..
Rosalia, D. (2020). Tradisi punjungan pada perkawinan masyarakat jawa transmigran (Studi Kasus: Masyarakat Jawa di Jorong Sungai Tenang, Nagari Kunangan Parik Rantang, Kecamatan Kamang Baru, Kabupaten Sijunjung ). Nosarara: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 75–86.
Sahoo, A. K. (2021). Routledge Handbook of Asian Diaspora and Development. Routledge. Schrift, A. D. (2014). The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Routledge.
Seligman, A. B., & Weller, R. P. (2019). How Things Count as the Same: Memory, Mimesis, and Metaphor. Oxford University Press.
Suraya, R. S., Kumbara, A. N. A., Pujaastawa, I. B. G., & Wiasti, N. M. (n.d.). Function of Haroa Oral Tradition Practices in Religious Life towards Muna Society. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 67–76.
Timmons, M. (2019). Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford University Press. Viliandis, I. (2020). Institut agama islam negeri (iain) metro lampung 1441 H/ 2020 M. 76.
Wahyuning, P. T. (2018). Analyzing community’s perspectives toward the coastal resources in Munjung Agung village, Kramat Regency, Tegal district of Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 84(12).
Yakin, H. S. M., & Totu, A. (2014). The semiotic perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A brief comparative study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 4–8.
Yohana, F. M. (2015). A Semiotic-analysis based on peirce triadic theory on taglines of nokia, honda, airasia, lg and you c 1000 advertising. DEIKSIS, 7(01), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v7i01.533
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Umar Alfaruq A. Hasyim, Nurul Puspita, Zulqurnain Sabir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
