Engineering and Financial Feasibility of Residential Housing Using Greenship Rating Tool Parameters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/ajse.v1i2.545Keywords:
Greenship Rating Tool, Engineering Feasibility, Financial Preliminary StudyAbstract
Green building aims to reduce environmental effect by improving indoor air quality for households and the community. Green buildings use the Greenship Rating Tools evaluation standards to accomplish environmentally sustainable residential development. Purpose of the study: The most important part of this thesis is to do a engineering and financial preliminary study before the construction of houses. Methods: Three home types (48/66, 70/84, and 80/112) will be used to generate Malang Residential Home data for this project. On the basis of BBC, BFC, and GBC, the technical viability will be assessed. The NPV, BCR, IRR, and PBP will be utilized to establish the project's financial viability. Variations in capital proportion, as well as increases or decreases in project revenue and outcome, would all be included when calculating sensitivity. Results: Between 60% and 75% of the BBC's technical feasibility has been determined, whereas BFC is between 0.60 and 1%, and GBC is larger than 10%. To put Malang Residential Housing in the silver level, IDR 1,382,745,228 was the NPV, with a BCR of 1.02, an IRR of 59.75 percent, and a PBP of one year and six months. It was concluded that the project was viable based on the sensitivity of the project's income and results to its viability.
Keywords: Greenship Rating Tool, Engineering Feasibility, Financial Preliminary Study
References
[1] Altomonte et al., (2020). "Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment," Building and Environment, vol. 180, p. 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949
[2] GBCI, (2014). "Greenship Homes Version 1.0," Dir. Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian GBCI, Jakarta.
[3] Lavagna et al., (2018). "Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock," Building and Environment, vol. 145, pp. 260-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008
[4] Lien, C. D. Steggell, B. Slaug, and S. Iwarsson, (2016). "Assessment and analysis of housing accessibility: adapting the environmental component of the housing enabler to United States applications," Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9475-0
[5] Preciado-Pérez and S. Fotios, (2017) "Comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of energy efficiency in social housing. Case study: Northwest Mexico," Energy and Buildings, vol. 152, pp. 279-289.
https://www.cheric.org/research/tech/periodicals/doi.php?art_seq=1575404
[6] Tuan, P. Tran, K. Hawley, F. Khan, and M. Moench, (2015). "Quantitative cost-benefit analysis for typhoon resilient housing in Danang city, Vietnam," Urban Climate, vol. 12, pp. 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.01.002
[7] Soon and C. Tan, (2019). "An analysis on housing affordability in Malaysian housing markets and the home buyers’ preference," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-01-2019-0009
[8] Pardo-Bosch,C. Cervera, and T.Ysa, (2019) "Key aspects of building retrofitting: strategizing sustainable cities," Journal of environmental management, vol. 248, p. 109247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.018
[9] Mawat, A. S. Dawood, and Z. M. Alhasan, (2019). "A brief review of the environmental assessment of green building in developing countries," International Journal of Novel Research in Engineering and Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7-15.
[10] Shen, C. Cheng, X. Li, and Z. Zhang, (2019) "Environmental cost-benefit analysis of prefabricated public housing in Beijing," Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010207
[11] Zhang, M. Zhou, X. Luo, and L. Huang, (2021). "Spatially subsidized benefits-based spatial decision for affordable housing: prototype and case study in China," Journal of Urban Planning and Development, vol. 147, no. 1, p. 05020030. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000633
[12] Dolzer and U. Kriebaum, (2022). Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[13] C. K. K. Marsiwi, T. Y. R. Syah, S. Pusaka, and R. Indradewa, (2019). "Investment feasibility analysis in financial aspects of startup business in lifestyle combining barbershop and coffee shop over PT. Jeeva Work Corporation," Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 97-100. https://www.kemalapublisher.com/index.php/JoMA/article/view/398
[14] Jrade and F. Jalaei, (2014). "Using building information modeling to evaluate the costs and benefits of adopting sustainable universal houses in Canada," International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling (IJ3DIM), vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 56-76. https://doi.org/10.4018/ij3dim.2014100104
[15] Luque, N. Ikromov, and W. B. Noseworthy, (2019). Affordable Housing Development: Financial Feasibility, Tax Increment Financing and Tax Credits. Springer.
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-04064-2
[16] Jeddi Yeganeh, A. P. McCoy, and S. Hankey, (2019). "Green affordable housing: Cost-benefit analysis for zoning incentives," Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 6269.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226269
[18] S. Mumtaaz Sayed and P. H. Sawant, (2016). "Financial feasibility analysis of water conservation components in mass housing projects: Suburban Indian Case review," Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 04016001. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29AE.1943-5568.0000200
