Occupational Safety And Health (K3) Through The Risk Evaluating Process For Pt Cozy Boarding House Project Workers Prima Land In Malang

Fifi Damayanti; Handika Setya Wijaya; Yohanes Nahak

doi:10.51278/ajse.v3i2.1688

Authors

Fifi Damayanti Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi Malang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8786-604X
Handika Setya Wijaya Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4526-8216
Yohanes Nahak Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51278/ajse.v3i2.1688

Abstract

Construction companies must focus on occupational health and safety (K3) and must cover the safety and welfare of workers. JKK (Work Safety Committee) has carried out various safety assessments and risk assessments to improve worker safety and health. Comfortable Housing Boarding House PT. has carried out a risk assessment using the Prima Land method to assess the risk and safety of construction projects. The study found 13.3% of risks were classified as extreme, 30% high risk, 13.3% moderate risk, and 43.34% low risk. Risk assessment methods will be used in this research to further improve K3 working conditions and ensure worker safety. This study identified three main factors that influence OHS health and safety: organizational culture, environment, and risk assessment methods. By implementing these measures, construction companies can improve their OSH safety and health management section and reduce the risk of accidents and injuries.

References

D. Chong et al., “Modeling the volatile organic compounds emissions from asphalt pavement construction and assessing health risks for workers with uncertainty analysis,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 22, no. March, p. e04507, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04507.

Bergman Bruhn, C. Lindahl, I. M. Andersson, and G. Rosén, “Motivational factors for occupational safety and health improvements: A mixed-method study within the Swedish equine sector,” Saf. Sci., vol. 159, no. August 2022, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106035.

G. Vitrano and G. J. L. Micheli, “National occupational safety and health systems: Exploring the underlying networks for future sustainable development,” Sustain. Futur., vol. 8, no. August 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100382.

E. Stefana, F. Ustolin, and N. Paltrinieri, “IMPROSafety: A risk-based framework to integrate occupational and process safety,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 75, no. November 2021, p. 104698, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104698.

E. M. Rudolf, A. Kjærgaard, J. Palmqvist, M. E. Jakobsen, and J. Z. N. Ajslev, “Improving occupational safety and health motivation through a dialogue-based inspection practice,” Saf. Sci., vol. 187, no. March, p. 106857, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106857.

M. Kutscher, “ScienceDirect Development of an HTO-based framework for occupational health management in high-risk environments,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 88, pp. 331–340, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2025.05.040.

N. Cai et al., “Integrated internal and external exposure models for dimethylformamide risk assessment and health risk monetization,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 291, no. February, p. 117890, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117890.

D. U. Park et al., “Management and Collection of Occupational Data for Health (ODH) in National Public Health Statistics: Evaluation and Recommendations for Korea,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.11.006.

E. Senerth et al., “Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study,” Environ. Int., vol. 195, no. November 2024, p. 109209, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109209.

C. Trask and H. C. Linderoth, “Digital technologies in construction: A systematic mapping review of evidence for improved occupational health and safety,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 80, no. July, p. 108082, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108082.

K. Eliasson, C. Lewis, T. Hellman, G. Dahlgren, M. Svartengren, and T. Nyman, “Does occupational health surveillance lead to risk reduction for workers exposed to hand-intensive work?,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 112, no. June, p. 104074, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104074.

P. Soonklang, A. Ketsakorn, N. Homkham, C. Chaikittiporn, and S. Norkaew, “Comparison of real-time instrument use and absorbent tube method for measuring formaldehyde in working environments: A health risk assessment for gross anatomy staff,” Toxicol. Reports, vol. 14, no. January, p. 101913, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101913.

M. E. Jakobsen, A. Kjærgaard, E. M. Rudolf, J. Palmqvist, and J. Z. N. Ajslev, “Enterprise Characteristics Were Associated With Adherence to a Dialog-based Inspection Practice Aimed at Improving Occupational Safety and Health in Denmark,” Saf. Health Work, no. xxxx, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.05.002.

H. Ebrahimi, S. Vosoughi, A. F. Hosseini, and A. Hatami, “Comprehensive Survey of the Truck Transportation Process: The Impact of Team Driving on Health and Safety Conditions,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. September, p. e37880, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024139114

A. Ghahramani, M. Ebrahimi, and M. Hajaghazadeh, “Development and psychometric evaluation of an occupational health and safety performance tool for manufacturing companies,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e17343, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17343.

S. Ø. Stensland et al., “Development and psychometric validation of the frontline health workers’ occupational risk and characteristics in emergencies index (FORCE-index) – The covid Hospital cohort study,” Public Heal. Pract., vol. 9, no. January, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100582.

J. Guzman, G. A. Recoco, A. W. Pandi, J. M. Padrones, and J. J. Ignacio, “Evaluating workplace safety in the oil and gas industry during the COVID-19 pandemic using occupational health and safety Vulnerability Measure and partial least square Structural Equation Modelling,” Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, p. 100378, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100378.

A. Mazzi, “Environmental and safety risk assessment for sustainable circular production: Case study in plastic processing for fashion products,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e21352, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21352.

D. M. Shoaib et al., “Evaluation of occupational health and safety intervention for the waste and sanitation workers in Bangladesh during COVID-19,” Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, vol. 255, no. July 2023, p. 114288, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114288.

Y. Shen, J. Wang, P. Yang, and Q. Chen, “Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff,” J. Behav. Cogn. Ther., vol. 34, no. 4, p. 100512, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100512.

G. Vitrano, D. Urso, G. J. L. Micheli, A. Guglielmi, D. De Merich, and M. Pellicci, “Enabling Effective Implementation of Occupational Safety and Health Interventions,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 213–219, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.04.003.

G. Malta, V. Traversini, O. Kocak, Y. Goktas, S. Kucuk, and E. Cannizzaro, “Enhancing occupational health literacy in the context of SDGs: Evidence from Sicilian workers,” Public Health, vol. 244, no. January, p. 105738, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105738.

F. Khan, I. Alsaduni, O. Khan, and M. Parvez, “Enhancing safety and risk management in biodiesel production: a machine learning approach using k-means clustering to address operational challenges and standardization issues,” Results Eng., vol. 26, no. April, p. 105175, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105175.

L. Sharp, P. Fransson, M. Fowler, and H. Ullgren, “Aspects of occupational safety: a survey among European cancer nurses,” Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs., vol. 70, no. April, p. 102595, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102595.

M. Itarte et al., “Assessing environmental exposure to viruses in wastewater treatment plant and swine farm scenarios with next-generation sequencing and occupational risk approaches,” Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, vol. 259, no. March, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114360.

Z. Xinliang et al., “Assessing the importance and safety of hypoxia conditioning for patients with occupational pulmonary diseases: A recent clinical perspective,” Biomed. Pharmacother., vol. 178, p. 117275, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117275.

G. Arana-Landín, I. Laskurain-Iturbe, M. Iturrate, and B. Landeta-Manzano, “Assessing the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on occupational health and safety,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13720.

A. P. Pribadi, Y. M. R. Rahman, and C. D. A. B. Silalahi, “Analysis of the effectiveness and user experience of employing virtual reality to enhance the efficacy of occupational safety and health learning for electrical workers and graduate students,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 15, p. e34918, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34918.

M. F. Portilha-Cunha, P. Norton, A. Alves, A. R. L. Ribeiro, A. M. T. Silva, and M. S. F. Santos, “Antineoplastic drugs in healthcare settings: Occupational exposure and risk graduation,” Emerg. Contam., vol. 11, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100418.

H. Tian, S. Zhang, H. Garg, and X. Liu, “An extended SECA-GDM method considering flexible linguistic scale optimization and its application in occupational health and safety risk assessment,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 88, no. January, pp. 317–330, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.01.026.

M. Jarota, “Artificial intelligence in the work process. A reflection on the proposed European Union regulations on artificial intelligence from an occupational health and safety perspective,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 49, p. 105825, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105825.