Personal and National Narratives: Systemic Functional Linguistic Analysis of 'I' and 'We' in the Biden’s Presidential Campaign
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/bse.v4i2.1258Keywords:
Systemic Functional Linguistics, Ideational Metafunction, Biden, PoliticsAbstract
This study delves into Joe Biden's use of the personal pronouns "I" and "We" in his presidential campaign speeches, analyzed through the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). By examining how Biden presents himself and the nation, the research uncovers the narratives crafted to promote a sense of unity and leadership. The SFL framework provides a detailed description of the linguistic choices that shape Biden's self-representation and his depiction of America, highlighting the strategies used to connect with voters on both personal and national levels. The results reveal Biden's portrayal of America, his vision for the future, and the specific policies he advocates. Such portrayals are expressed through six processes of Ideational metafunction: Material, Mental, Behavioral, Verbal, Existential, and Relational. Relational process is the highest process found in the data. It implies Biden’s inclusivity as common American people and his effort to resonate with a diverse audience. In short, this analysis enhances the understanding of the rhetorical tools utilized in political discourse to create impactful narratives.
References
Al Afnan, M. A. (2021). Public discourse: Systemic functional analysis of Trump’s and Biden’s inaugural speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1).
Anastassov, V. H. (2018). Power and truth in political discourse: Language and ideological narratives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bachmann, R., & Gleibs, I. H. (2024). Uncovering the Secret Life of We-Pronouns in the German Parliament. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual review of political science, 21(1), 49-70.
Davidse, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2008). Introduction: The realization of interpersonal meaning. Word, 59(1-2), 3-23.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political discourse and political cognition. Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, 203, 203-237.
Farwell, J. P. (2012). Persuasion and power: The art of strategic communication. Georgetown University Press.
Gebhard, M., & Accurso, K. (2020). Systemic functional linguistics. The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1029-1103.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Hoang, V. V. (2021). “Metafunctions of language” in systemic functional linguistics: A framework for the interpretation of meaning of text in social context. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(4).
Krawrungruang, K., & Yaoharee, O. (2018). The Use of Personal Pronoun in Political Discourse: A Case Study of the Final 2016 United States Presidential Election Debate. Reflections, 25(1), 85-96.
Kroo, J. (2022). Negotiating identities: First person pronominal use between Japanese university students. Pragmatics and Society, 13(1), 22-44.
Lauscher, A., Crowley, A., & Hovy, D. (2022). Welcome to the modern world of pronouns: Identity-inclusive natural language processing beyond gender. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11923.
Lilleker, D. G. (2019). The power of visual political communication: Pictorial politics through the lens of communication psychology. Visual political communication, 37-51.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). THEME as a resource in ideational 'knowledge' construction. Thematic Development in English Texts. London: Pinter Publishers, 20-55.
Mushtaq, M., Saleem, T., Afzal, S., & Saleem, A. (2021). A corpus-based ideational meta-functional analysis of Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s speech at United Nations general assembly. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1856999.
Megah, S. I. (2021). An Analysis of Ideological Construction of Soekarno’s twelve good expressions of the selected political speeches. Cahaya Pendidikan, 7(2), 96-106.
Omer, Y. A., & Ali, W. I. (2021). Translating ideational meaning in political texts: A systemic functional perspective. Journal of Language Studies, 4(3), 115-154.
Packard, G., Moore, S. G., & McFerran, B. (2018). (I'm) happy to help (you): The impact of personal pronoun use in customer–firm interactions. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 541-555.
Romadlani, M. M. I. (2021). Personal Pronouns in American Presidential Political Discourse. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 201-215.
Scholz, O. R. (2012). On the very idea of a textual meaning. In Understanding Fiction (pp. 135-145). Brill mentis.
Wanselin, H., Danielsson, K., & Wikman, S. (2022). Analysing multimodal texts in science—A social semiotic perspective. Research in science education, 52(3), 891-907.
Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). A discourse analysis: Personal pronouns in Donald Trump's inauguration speech. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 346-350).
Wilson, J. (2015). Political discourse. The handbook of discourse analysis, 775-794.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Habiba Al Umami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
