Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation

Authors

  • Erlinawati Erlinawati Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Muslimah Muslimah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v1i1.96

Keywords:

Validity and Relibility, Learning Evaluation

Abstract

The evaluation aimed to get achievement in assessing an educational target by students. In terms of assessment, a quality assessment tool is needed to fulfil two things: validity and reliability. Information that lacks validity and reliability will lead to biased conclusions was not in sync with what it should be and may differ from habit. This article aimed to determine the basic concepts of the validity and reliability of tests in evaluation. This article was also written using literary study methods and qualitative approaches. The discussion of this article, namely: validity is the degree of ability of a test that measures what is to be measured in learning. There are two kinds of validity, namely logical validity and empirical validity. Four types of validity are often used: content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity, and predictive validity. At the same time, reliability is another character of the evaluation results in learning. Reliability can also be interpreted as the same as consistency or consistency. There are two general ways to measure reliability, namely: reliability stability and equivalent reliability.

Keywords: Validity and Relibility, Learning Evaluation

References

Burhan Nurdiyantoro, Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa, Yogyakarta: BPFE 2010.
Du, Y., Arkesteijn, M. H., den Heijer, A. C., & Song, K. (2020). Sustainable Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions: Guidelines for Developing a Tool for China. Sustainability, 12(16), 6501.
Ilker, E. (2014). A Validity and Reliability Study of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(3), 829-833.
Joko Widiyanto, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Madiun: Unipma Press, 2013.
Günüç, S., Odabasi, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2014). Developing an effective lifelong learning scale (ELLS): Study of validity & reliability. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171).
Kalk, K., Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Täht, K. (2014). Validity and reliability of two instruments to measure reflection: A confirmatory study. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 18(2).
Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171.
Miranda, L. C., Araújo, A. M., & Almeida, L. S. (2016). Identification of gifted students by teachers: Reliability and validity of the cognitive abilities and learning scale. RIDPSICLO, 2(3), 5.
Nerita, S., Maizeli, A., & Afza, A. (2017). Student analysis of handout development based on guided discovery method in process evaluation and learning outcomes of biology. IOP Publishing, 895(1), 1-4.
Peijuan, Z., Ming, W. C., Zhouhong, Z., & Liqi, W. (2017). A new active learning method based on the learning function U of the AK-MCS reliability analysis method. Engineering Structures, 148, 185-194.
Pitkethly, A. J., & Lau, P. W. (2016). Reliability and validity of the short Hong Kong Chinese Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS-C). International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(3), 210-226.
Saiful Azwar, Reliabilitas dan Validitas, Cetakan ke-4, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2018.
Shrader, S., Farland, M. Z., Danielson, J., Sicat, B., & Umland, E. M. (2017). A systematic review of assessment tools measuring interprofessional education outcomes relevant to pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(6).
Shen, W. Q., Chen, H. L., & Hu, Y. (2014). The validity and reliability of the self-directed learning instrument (SDLI) in mainland Chinese nursing students. BMC medical education, 14(1), 108.
Sukardi, Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009.
Topala, I., & Tomozii, S. (2014). Learning satisfaction: Validity and reliability testing for students’ learning satisfaction questionnaire (SLSQ). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 380-386.
Zainal Arifin, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.
Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A. A., & Pike, G. R. (2017). Student engagement and student learning: Examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised national survey of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 880-903.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-06

How to Cite

Erlinawati, E., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 1(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v1i1.96

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.