Learning Model Group Investigation (GI) in Increasing Ability Critical Thinking Students in Animal Ecology Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v5i1.574Keywords:
Critical Thinking Skills, Group Investigation, Learning ModelAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the group investigation (GI) learning model on students' critical thinking skills, requiring one control class and one experimental class. The research method used is a quasi-experiment (quasi-experiment). Then the experimental class and the control class were given an initial test (pretest) and ended with a final test (posttest). This study also uses the documentation method as a data collection tool. Furthermore, several tests were carried out to analyze the data obtained from this study, including the normality test and homogeneity test. The results of the unpaired t-test analysis of critical thinking skills can be seen in Table 4 below. The results of the t-test for unpaired data on critical thinking skills in Table 4 show that the sig. 0.000 <0.05 means that Ha is declared accepted, then the learning model used affects the UMP Palembang Biology study program students' critical thinking skills.
Keywords: Critical Thinking Skills, Group Investigation, Learning Model
References
Ananda, R. (2017). Implementasi nilai-nilai moral dan agama pada anak usia dini. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v1i1.28
Darmawan, E., Ismirawati, N., Ristanto, R. H., & Rumah, P. P. (2021). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Penerbit Pustaka Rumah C1nta. Google Scholar
Fakhriyah, F. (2014). Penerapan problem based learning dalam upaya mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2906
Liberna, H. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa melalui penggunaan metode IMPROVE pada materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 2(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v2i3.101
Magdalena, I., Aj, A. H., Auliya, D., & Ariani, R. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VI Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Di SDN Cipete 2. PENSA, 2(1), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.36088/pensa.v2i1.848
Meirisa, A., Rifandi, R., & Masniladevi, M. (2018). Pengaruh pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia (PMRI) terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SD. Jurnal Gantang, 3(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v3i2.508
Novikasari, I. (2009). Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Open-ended di Sekolah Dasar. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 14(2), 346-364. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v14i2.338
Samura, A. O. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 5(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.30743/mes.v5i1.1934
Sele, Y., Sila, V. U. R., Dewi, N. P. Y. A., Shidik, M. A., & Simarmata, J. E. (2021). Sosialisasi Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan Bagi Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Desa Eban Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 5(3), 1050-1059. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v5i3.5005
Susmita, U. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Materi Sumber Daya Alam Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 104312 Kota Tengah (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara). Google Scholar
Rositawati, D. N. (2019). Kajian berpikir kritis pada metode inkuiri. In Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Aplikasinya) (Vol. 3, pp. 74-84). https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v3i0.28514
Oktaviani, O., Jalmo, T., & Marpaung, R. R. T. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah, 2(6). Google Scholar
Wayudi, M., Suwatno, S., & Santoso, B. (2020). Kajian analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran (JPManper), 5(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v5i1.25853
