Learning of Status of Physical Properties of Peat in Palm Oil, Areca and Coffee in Mekar Jaya Village
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v4i3.524Keywords:
Physical Properties, Status Physical Properties, PlantingAbstract
The aim of the research was to see the differences caused by planting oil palm, areca nut, coffee and forest plantations. While the benefits to be achieved are to be able to make preventive recommendations so that the properties of peat soil will always be stable and peat soil can be used sustainably. The research was conducted in a field survey using Proportional Random Sampling Method on oil palm, areca nut, coffee and secondary forest soils. Samples were taken from each plant as many as 20 samples. Data were analyzed on land planted with oil palm, areca nut, coffee and forest soil. To see the differences in the physical properties of the soil, peat thickness, peat water level, organic matter content, c-organic content, r volume weight, water content in the Unpaired Median Value Test at the 5% level (Steel and Torrie, 1995). From the research results, the unpaired mean test results for oil palm, areca nut, coffee and forest soil were obtained at the depth of peat soil on oil palm plantations, which was significantly different from the depth of peat soil on areca palm, coffee plantations and with coffee plantation soil and forest soil. The organic matter content for pinnag and forest plants is the same, but significantly different for oil palm and coffee plants. Meanwhile, C-oganic levels differed between oil palm, areca nut, coffee and forest plants. The volume weight is significantly different from the volume weight in areca palm, coffee and forest plantations. The soil water content in oil palm plants has the same water content as coffee and is significantly different from that of areca nut and forest plants. The conclusion is that the physical properties of the soil on coffee plants are almost the same as forest soil.
Keywords: Physical Properties, Status Physical Properties, Planting
References
Dariah A and S Nurzakiah. 2014. Peatland Water Management Guide to the Sustainable Management of Degraded Peatlands. HallSoil Research. Bogor. pp 30-46.
Djaenudin, D., Marwan, H., Subagyo, H., and Hidayat, A. 2011. Technical Instructions Land Evaluation for Agricultural Commodities. Research and Development Center for Resources Agricultural Land, Agency for Agricultural Research and Development: Bogor. pg 154
Harjowigeno S. 2015 Soil Science .Akademika Pressindo. Jakarta .
Heriyanto, Asrol, Detry Karya, and VY Ningsih. 2018. Factor Analysis of Palm Oil Production People According to Land Typology in Indragiri Hilir Regency, Riau Province. Journal of Suboptimal Land. Riau.
Las I, K Nugroho and A Hidayat. 2008 Peatland Utilization Strategy For Sustainable Agricultural Development . Development Journal Agricultural Innovation .2 ( 4 ) : 295-298.
Masganti, Nurhayati, Rachmiwati Yusuf, and Hery Widyanto. 2015 .Technology Environmentally Friendly in Oil Palm Cultivation in Peatlands degraded. Review paper. ISSN 1907-0799.
Melling, L., Hatano, R. 2010. Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Peatland for Oil Palm Plantation Proceeding of Palangkaraya International Symposium & Workshop On Tropical Peatland. Department of Soil Science and Land Resources Building. Bogor Agricultural University.
MS Napitu and Mudiantoro. 2015. Management of Water Resources on Land Sustainable Peat. Journal of the Annual Civil Engineering Seminar M2015, Pekanbaru.
Najiyati, S., Lili Muslihat and I Nyoman N. Suryadiputra. 2005. Guide Management of Peatlands for Sustainable Agriculture. Project Climate Change, Forests and Peatlands in Indonesia. Wetlands - International – Indonesia Program and Wildlife Habitat Canada. Bogor Indonesia Noor M, Masganti, and F Agus. 2014. Peat Formation and Characteristics Indonesian Tropics. Agency for Agricultural Research and Development (Editio Revision).
Nugroho T and Budi. 2010 . Potential Land Suitability Study For PlantationPalm Oil in Blitar district . J. Agriculture MAPETA Volume 12 ( 2 ) : 72- 144.
Sasongko, PE 2010. Potential Land Suitability Study for Coconut Plants Oil palm in Blitar Regency. J. MAPETA Agriculture Vol. 12(2):72-144.
Suhatman Y, A Suryanto and L Setyobudi. 2016. Conformity Study of Environmental Factors and Morphological Characteristics of Productive Oil Palm Plants (Elaeis guineensis). J. Production of Plants Vol. 4(3):192-198.
Suratman, Widiatmaka, Pramudya, B Yanuar, M Purwanto, JF. August 2019. Variation of Peatland Biophysical Characteristics with Several Uses Kampar Peninsula , Riau Province. Research and Development Center for Resources Land power Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Development Agency and Graduate School of IPB Bogor University . Land Journal 43 ( 2 ) : 97 -108.
Suryadipitra, INN, A Dohong, RSB Waspodo, L. Muslihat. IR Lubis , F
Hasudugan, ITC Wibisono. 2005 . Guide to Blocking Ditches and Canals at
Peat land with the Community. Climate Change Project. Porests an
Peatlads in Indonesia . Weatlands International – Indonesia Program and
Wildlife Habitats . Bogor . 172 pages .
Suswanti, D ,. Hendro, BS, Siddieq., D., and Dewa., DI. 2011 . Identification Physical Characteristics of the Peatlands of Rasau Jaya III, Kubu Raya Regency For Development of Corn Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Gajah mad . Yogyakarta
Steel , R G. D James' and Torrie . 1995. Publisher PT . Main Library GramediaJakarta
Wahyunto, S Ritung, Suparto, H Subagjo. 2005. Distribution of Peat and Content Carbon in Sumatra and Kalimantan. Project Climate Change, Forest and Peatlands in Indonesia. Wetlands International – Indonesia Program and Canadian Wildlife Habitats. Bogor. Indonesia.
