From Perplexity to Mathematical Certainty: Reflective Clarificative Thinking in Solving Systems of Linear Equations

Authors

  • Novisita Ratu Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Stevanus Budi Waluya Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Wardono Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Kristina Wijayanti Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Scholastika Mariani Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v8i4.2953

Keywords:

Reflective Clarificative Thinking, Perplexity, Systems of Linear Equations, Problem Solving, Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers

Abstract

Solving systems of linear equations may generate doubt that requires scrutiny of information, procedures, and results. This study aims to describe and reconstruct pre-service mathematics teachers’ reflective clarificative thinking in addressing perplexity across Polya’s four problem-solving stages. A qualitative multiple-case study involved two purposively selected participants who solved the same traffic-flow conservation problem using substitution. Data were collected through a problem-solving test and in-depth task-based interviews, including a follow-up interview on S2’s solution checking, and examined through within-case and cross-case analyses. The findings show that S1 engaged in confirmatory clarification by verifying the equations to establish solution correctness. S2 engaged in corrective clarification by detecting an inconsistency, tracing a subtraction error, correcting the initial value and its dependent variables, and verifying the revised solution without changing the substitution method. Both forms of clarification supported mathematically justified certainty. This study contributes a distinction between confirmatory and corrective clarification as responses to doubt during problem solving. These findings highlight the importance of learning activities that encourage pre-service teachers to articulate uncertainty, examine sources of error, explain corrections, and verify solutions against all problem conditions, thereby strengthening their capacity to justify solutions and make mathematical judgments grounded in careful reasoning that can be substantiated.

 

References

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001

Aras, I., Pratiwi, E., Nanna, A. W. I., & Barumbun, M. (2022). * Corresponding author. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 718–726.

Artigue, M., & Houdement, C. (2007). Problem solving in France: Didactic and curricular perspectives. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0048-x

Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129

Baumgartner, V., Daguati, S., Trninic, D., Akveld, M., Caspar, A., Hungerbühler, N., & Kapur, M. (2025). Problem-solving before instruction for learning linear algebra in university mathematics. Instructional Science, 53(6), 1573–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09709-8

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Betül Kaya, Z., & Kepceoglu, I. (2022). Metacognitive Failures of Preservice Mathematics Teachers ın Problem Solving. Athens Journal of Sciences, 9(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.9-4-4

Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word Problem Solving in Contemporary Math Education: A Plea for Reading Comprehension Skills Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(February), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191

Boonen, A. J. H., Reed, H. C., Schoonenboom, J., & Jolles, J. (2016). It’s not a math lesson-we’re learning to draw! teachers’ use of visual representations in instructing word problem solving in sixth grade of elementary school. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 34–61. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i5.245

Carlson, D. (1993). Teaching Linear Algebra: Must the Fog Always Roll in? The College Mathematics Journal, 24(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1993.11973503

Choy, S. Cp. S. O. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167–182.

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Demirel, M., Derman, I., & Karagedik, E. (2015). A Study on the Relationship between Reflective Thinking Skills towards Problem Solving and Attitudes towards Mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 2086–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.326

Dewey, J. (1933). (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Book, 8(5), 324.

Geng, H. (2011). Self-Monitoring in Solving Math Problems. Education, 6(1), 29–33.

Giyarti, W., Putranto, S., & Sofyan Tio Fajar Maulana. (2025). Mathematical Problem Solving and Its Teaching: Study from Indonesian Preservice Teachers. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 9(4), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v9i4.10707

Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive skills and problem- solving to cite this article : metacognitive skills and problem-solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715–734. Retrieved from https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/1594

Hidajat, F. A., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirma, & Susisw. (2019). Exploration of students’ arguments to identify perplexity from reflective process on mathematical problems. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12236a

Jacobse, A. E., & Harskamp, E. G. (2012). Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9088-x

Jiang, P., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., & Xiong, B. (2022). Preservice mathematics teachers’ perceptions of mathematical problem solving and its teaching: A case from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(November), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998586

John H Flavell. (1979). John H. Flavell, Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Metacognition-and-Cognitive-Monitoring%3A-A-New-Area-Flavell/ee652f0f63ed5b0cfe0af4cb4ea76b2ecf790c8d

Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107

Kaune, C. (2006). Reflection and metacognition in mathematics education - tools for the improvement of teaching quality. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652795

Lit, S., Kool, M., & Drijvers, P. (2026). Teacher knowledge and skills for mathematical problem solving: a systematic literature review. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-025-09737-8

Mafarja, N., Rahim, S. S. A., & Zulnaidi, H. (2026). Enhancing Mathematical Thinking Among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 16(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261445506

Mannan, A. M. K., Bajuri, M. R., Abdul Rahim, S. S., & Abdullah, N. A. (2026). How do digital tools support metacognition in mathematics learning? A systematic review of research on GeoGebra and problem-solving. Educational Research Review, 52(February), 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100827

Melanie G. Gurat, C. T. M. J. (2016). Metacognitive Strategy Knowledge Use through Mathematical Problem Solving amongst Pre-service Teachers. 4(2), 170–189. Retrieved from https://pubs.sciepub.com/education/4/2/5/index.html

Nanna, A. W. I., & Pratiwi, E. (2020). Students’ Cognitive Barrier in Problem Solving: Picture-based Problem-solving. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i1.5652

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nur, F., Ajizah, F., & Mariani, S. (2026). Circle : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Systematic Literature Review : The Relationship Between Metacognition and Students ’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. 6(2), 123–147.

Özsoy, G., & Ataman, A. (2009). (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 68–83. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED508334

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181

Rott, B., Specht, B., & Knipping, C. (2021a). A descriptive phase model of problem-solving processes. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(4), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01244-3

Rott, B., Specht, B., & Knipping, C. (2021b). A descriptive phase model of problem-solving processes. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(4), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01244-3

Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Mathematical practices, in theory and practice. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(6), 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01162-w

Tachie, S. A. (2019a). Foundation phase students’ metacognitive abilities in mathematics classes: Reflective classroom discourse using an open approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(4), 528–544. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.528

Tachie, S. A. (2019b). Meta-cognitive skills and strategies application: How this helps learners in mathematics problem-solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105364

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Yorulmaz, A., Uysal, H., & Çokçalışkan, H. (2021). Pre-service primary school teachers’ metacognitive awareness and beliefs about mathematical problem solving. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.14349

Zulu, M. W., & Mudaly, V. (2023). Unveiling problem-solving strategies of pre-service mathematics teachers: A visual and discursive exploration. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13344

Downloads

Published

2026-11-12

How to Cite

Novisita Ratu, Stevanus Budi Waluya, Wardono, Kristina Wijayanti, & Scholastika Mariani. (2026). From Perplexity to Mathematical Certainty: Reflective Clarificative Thinking in Solving Systems of Linear Equations. Attractive : Innovative Education Journal, 8(4), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v8i4.2953

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.