Synergy between Learning Interests and Learning Environment as Determinants of Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v8i2.2620Keywords:
Learning Interest, Learning Environment, Learning OutcomesAbstract
Learning outcomes are influenced by both internal and external factors, particularly learning interest and the learning environment. However, previous studies have shown inconsistent findings regarding the contribution of the learning environment to academic achievement. Therefore, This study aims to examine the the partial and simultaneous influence of learning interest and learning environment on students’ learning outcomes at SMK Bina Insan Mandiri Cirebon. A quantitative correlational design with an ex-post facto approach was employed. Data were collected from 48 students using Likert-scale questionnaires and academic score documentation. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The findings revealed that learning interest had a significant positive effect on learning outcomes (β = 0.781; p < 0.001), while the learning environment showed no significant direct effect (β = 0.027; p = 0.832). Simultaneously, both variables significantly influenced learning outcomes with an R² value of 0.642, indicating that 64.2% of the variance in learning outcomes could be explained by the model. These findings suggest that learning interest is the dominant predictor of students’ academic achievement, while the learning environment functions as a supporting factor in creating conducive learning conditions. This study contributes to strengthening the theoretical understanding of the hierarchical relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic factors in vocational education learning outcomes, while offering practical implications for educators to prioritize instructional strategies focused on enhancing students' internal motivation.
References
Abbott, A. L. (2017). Fostering student interest development: An engagement intervention. Middle School Journal, 48(3), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1297666
Akahome, J. E. (2026). Designing inclusive learning spaces in higher education: examining how physical and digital space design (learning commons, makerspaces) fosters community and engagement. Information and Learning Sciences, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-09-2025-0176
Ayu Lestari, Haetami2, A., & Rahman, A. (2023). Analisis Lingkungan Belajar, Minat Dan Motivasi Belajar Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kimia Siswa Sman Di Kabupaten Buton. Jurnal Biofiskim : Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33772/biofiskim.v5i2.574
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bandura, A. (2023). Cultivate self‐efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. Principles of organizational behavior: the handbook of evidence‐based management 3rd edition, 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394320769.ch6
Billett, S. (2025). Contemporary purposes for vocational education. In Opportunity Structures in Vocational Education and Training: National Studies and International Discussions (pp. 255-278). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04410-5_11
Black, W., & Babin, B. J. (2019). Multivariate data analysis: Its approach, evolution, and impact. In The great facilitator: Reflections on the contributions of Joseph F. Hair, Jr. to marketing and business research (pp. 121-130). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06031-2_16
Bonem, E. M., Fedesco, H. N., & Zissimopoulos, A. N. (2020). What you do is less important than how you do it: the effects of learning environment on student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 23(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09289-8
Bouw, E., Zitter, I., & De Bruijn, E. (2019). Characteristics of learning environments at the boundary between school and work–A literature review. Educational research review, 26, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.12.002
Chahal, A., Kadian, R., Yadav, R., & Prakash, C. (2026). Self-efficacy, learning motivation and academic satisfaction of university students: mediating role of classroom engagement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(1), 238-253, https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2024-0305
Chen, L. (2026). Examining the role of emotional regulation in vocational education: effects on academic performance, self-motivation, and learning satisfaction. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2026.2615728
Choi, S., & Kim, H. (2025). The impact of a large language model-based programming learning environment on students’ motivation and programming ability. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8109-8138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13107-x
Cleveland, L. M., Olimpo, J. T., & DeChenne-Peters, S. E. (2017). Investigating the relationship between instructors’ use of active-learning strategies and students’ conceptual understanding and affective changes in introductory biology: A comparison of two active-learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-06-0181
Creswell, J. W., & Inoue, M. (2025). A process for conducting mixed methods data analysis. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 26(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.736
De Bruijn, E., & Leeman, Y. (2011). Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: Challenges to vocational educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 694-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.007
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2023). Expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: Reflections on the legacy of 40+ years of working together. Motivation Science, 9(1), 1. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/mot0000275
Fjellström, M., & Kristmansson, P. (2016). Learning as an apprentice in Sweden: A comparative study on affordances for vocational learning in school and work life apprentice education. Education+ Training, 58(6), 629-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2015-0113
Gagné, M., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-determination theory applied to work motivation and organizational behavior. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.112
Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2021). Assessing the quality of university student experiences in blended course designs: An ecological perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 964-980. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1800597
Herrero, C., Arroyo, S. A., Castaño, M. J., Centeno, C., Coenen, J., McCoshan, A., ... & ZUBIZARRETA, P. A. (2025). Supporting the digital transformation of Vocational Education and Training. Herrero and M. Lopez Cobo, Eds. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/9727987
Huyler, D., & McGill, C. M. (2019). Book review: Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20258
Hyland, T. (2019). Embodied learning in vocational education and training. Journal of vocational education & training, 71(3), 449-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2018.1517129
Hoyt, R. E., Snider, D. H., Thompson, C. J., & Mantravadi, S. (2016). IBM Watson analytics: automating visualization, descriptive, and predictive statistics. JMIR public health and surveillance, 2(2), e5810. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.5810
Lai, H. R., Chou, W. L., Miao, N. F., Wu, Y. P., Lee, P. H., & Jwo, J. C. (2015). A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environments as perceived by middle school students. Journal of School Health, 85(6), 388-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12263
Li, T., Zhan, Z., Lin, Z., & Zhang, X. (2026). Assessment of higher-order thinking in education-A systematic review of empirical studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 90, 101655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101655
Mahdalena, M. (2022). Pengaruh Minat Belajar, Dukungan Orang Tua Dan Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Perilaku Belajar Siswa Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa (Studi Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Prilaku Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas 4,5 dan 6 Pada SDN Binuang 4 da. KINDAI, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.35972/kindai.v18i2.803
Makhfia, K. L., & Atmaja, H. E. (2022). Pengaruh Minat Dan Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Fe Universitas Tidar Pada Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar, Menengah Dan Tinggi [JMP-DMT], 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30596/jmp-dmt.v3i2.9661
Masruni, N. (2026). Karakteristik Utama Desain Penelitian Mixed Methods dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kualitas Penelitian. Tarbiyatul Ilmu: Jurnal kajian pendidikan, 3(8), 691-703. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20651176
Misbah, Z., Gulikers, J., Dharma, S., & Mulder, M. (2020). Evaluating competence-based vocational education in Indonesia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(4), 488-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1635634
Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Mixed methods research. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 305-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262619
Rifki Febrian, R., Rofi Ubaidillah, A., & Mufaizah, M. (2025). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Setingkat Menengah Atas. Journal Creativity, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.62288/zxxqta23
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2018). How individual interest influences situational interest and how both are related to knowledge acquisition: A microanalytical investigation. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 530-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1310710
Sardana, N., Shekoohi, S., Cornett, E. M., & Kaye, A. D. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative research methods. In Substance use and addiction research (pp. 65-69). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98814-8.00008-1
Schwartz, N. H., Click, K., & Bartel, A. N. (2022). Educational psychology: Learning and instruction. In International handbook of psychology learning and teaching (pp. 357-390). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_67
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 8, pp. 153-179). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
Semerikov, S. O., & Mintii, I. S. (2026). Multi-dimensional bibliometric framework for analyzing research adaptation during crisis: evidence from Ukrainian educational psychology. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102709
Sezgin, M. G., & Bektas, H. (2026). Effects of spaced learning on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and learning-related anxiety in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nurse Education Today, 107285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107285
Supriadi, Y., Sulaiman, S., & Sumini, S. (2023). Pengaruh Persepsi Siswa, Minat Belajar dan Lingkungan Belajar di Sekolah terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Sosial Dan Sains, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v3i4.724
Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
Unwin, L. (2024). Locating vocational education and training within the social infrastructure of communities past and present. In Handbook of Social Infrastructure (pp. 107-121). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800883130.00015
Van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Frèrejean, J. (2024). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Taylor & Francis, Google Scholar
Vos, S. G., Wijnia, L., Martens, R. L., & de Groot, R. H. (2025). How do distance learners self-regulate learning? A latent profile analysis of self-regulated learning and its relationship with self-regulatory efficacy, motivation, need satisfaction, need frustration, academic achievement, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 120, 102678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102678
Wahdi, A. S., Effendi, A., & Khurniawati, W. (2024). The relationship between student learning interest and learning outcomes. Journal of Informatics and Vocational Education, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.20961/joive.v7i1.81708
Wang, M. T., Binning, K. R., Del Toro, J., Qin, X., & Zepeda, C. D. (2021). Skill, thrill, and will: The role of metacognition, interest, and self-control in predicting student engagement in mathematics learning over time. Child development, 92(4), 1369-1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13531
Wardani, I. K., Nugroho, A. C., Sabekti, M., Murtiyasa, B., & Setyaningsih, N. (2024). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Matematika SDN Nglorog 3. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v4i1.1363
Witchel, H. J., Klein, R., Sinnayah, P., & Rathner, J. (2022). From Psychology Laboratory to Student Development: Untangling Momentary Engagement from Longer-Term Engagement in Bioscience Education. In Technologies in Biomedical and Life Sciences Education: Approaches and Evidence of Efficacy for Learning (pp. 85-131). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95633-2_4
Wulandari, R. I., Maulana, R. F., Imtiyaz, A. R., Felisa, A. S., Ramadhani, A. D., & Wulandari, A. (2024). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik di SMP Negeri 8 Gresik. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/b4tdaf34
Zhou, R., Feng, Q., Wen, H., Deng, Z., Ai, W., & Yen, G. G. (2026). GLPT: Global-local pyramid transformer for multivariate time series forecasting. Information Sciences, 123599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2026.123599
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Irsyadiah, Ishak Syairozi, Finantyo Eddy Wibowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
