Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) dalam Peningkatan Akses Pendidikan di SD Negeri 230 Maluku Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v8i2.2587Keywords:
Program Evaluation, Indonesia Smart Program, Access to Education, CIPP Model, Maluku TengahAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Indonesia Smart Program (PIP) in improving access to education at SD Negeri 230 Maluku Tengah using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product) developed by Stufflebeam (2003). This study employed a dominant qualitative mixed methods design, with data collected through Likert scale questionnaires (1-5) distributed to 13 respondents consisting of the principal, school operator, teachers, and parents, as well as in-depth interviews with 2 informants. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014) model. The results showed: (1) Context aspect, PIP is highly relevant to the needs of students from low-income families, with economic barriers being the main obstacle to educational access; (2) Input aspect, the criteria for beneficiaries are clear and well-targeted, and the school’s administrative readiness is very good, although the DAPODIK system’s inflexibility in updating recipient data was identified as a structural weakness; (3) Process aspect, implementation still faces challenges including delayed fund disbursement and funds not being fully used as intended, indicating suboptimal efficiency; (4) Product aspect, PIP has had a significant positive impact on students’ educational continuity, marked by reduced dropout rates and increased attendance, though it has not been proven to directly improve academic competence. This study concludes that PIP is effective as a dropout prevention program but requires improvements in fund disbursement timeliness, monitoring of fund usage, and data system flexibility. 9 Book Antiqua Font.
References
Asnawi, A. R., et al. (2021). Policy evaluation of the Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) in Indonesia's education system. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 559–572. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/iap/article/view/30363
Barella, Y., Ginting, D., Rasyid, M. N. A., & Mania, S. (2024). A case study on evaluation of the context, input, process, product (CIPP) implementation in the child-friendly school program. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 2235–2249. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1594
Barham, T., Macours, K., & Maluccio, J. A. (2024). Experimental evidence from a conditional cash transfer program: Schooling, learning, fertility, and labor market outcomes after 10 years. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(4), 1844–1883. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae005
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia University Press.
Behrman, J. R., Parker, S. W., & Todd, P. E. (2011). Do conditional cash transfers for schooling generate lasting benefits? A five-year follow up of PROGRESA/Oportunidades. Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2011.0019
BPS. (2023). Statistik kesejahteraan rakyat Maluku 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Maluku.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.
Cahyadi, N., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Prima, R. A., Satriawan, E., & Syamsulhakim, E. (2020). Cumulative impacts of conditional cash transfer programs: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(4), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190245
Chávez-Juárez, F. (2018). The effect of cash transfer programs on educational mobility. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0205957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205957
Coady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2004). Targeting of transfers in developing countries: Review of lessons and experience. World Bank.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Depdikbud. (2016). Petunjuk pelaksanaan program Indonesia pintar. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id
Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding public policy (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1
Glewwe, P., & Kassouf, A. L. (2012). The impact of the Bolsa Escola/Familia conditional cash transfer program on enrollment, dropout rates and grade promotion in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.07.009
Glewwe, P., & Muralidharan, K. (2016). Improving education outcomes in developing countries: Evidence, knowledge gaps, and policy implications. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 5, 653–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00010-5
Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the third world. Princeton University Press.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Panduan pelaksanaan program Indonesia pintar. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id
Kholik, B., Budiyanto, M. N., & Putra, R. (2024). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) sebagai upaya pemerataan pendidikan di SD Negeri 1 Jejawi. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v12i3
Lengkong, J. S. J., Pontoh, S., & Kaparang, M. (2024). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar sebagai kebijakan peningkatan kesetaraan pendidikan dan kurikulum. Journal on Education, 6(4). https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/4052579
Mahmudi. (2015). Manajemen kinerja sektor publik (Edisi Ketiga). UPP STIM YKPN.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Molina Millán, T., Barham, T., Macours, K., Maluccio, J. A., & Stampini, M. (2019). Long-term impacts of conditional cash transfers: Review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 34(1), 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lky005
Ninghardjanti, P., Murtini, W., Hindrayani, A., & Sangka, K. B. (2023). Evaluation of the smart training class at vocational high school using the CIPP model. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n3p135
Parker, S. W., & Vogl, T. (2023). Do conditional cash transfers improve economic outcomes in the next generation? Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Human Resources, 58(4), 1090–1124. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.58.4.0120-10742R1
Pratiwi, D., et al. (2023). Evaluasi pelaksanaan Program Indonesia Pintar di wilayah 3T Kalimantan menggunakan model CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i1
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Riduwan. (2013). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Alfabeta.
Schultz, T. W. (1971). Investment in human capital: The role of education and research. The Free Press.
SMERU Research Institute. (2020). Evaluasi pelaksanaan program Indonesia pintar di sekolah dasar dan sekolah menengah pertama. SMERU. https://smeru.or.id/en/publication
Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The CIPP model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. The Guilford Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryahadi, A., Al Izzati, R., & Suryadarma, D. (2020). Estimating the impact of COVID-19 on poverty in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1795244
UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000-2015: Achievements and challenges. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education — All means all. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989
Van den Berg, S. (2008). Poverty and education. Education Policy Series, 10. International Institute for Educational Planning/International Academy of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000177699
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education's promise. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Senny Denisa Lea Nampasnea, Bambang Ismanto, Stefanus C Relmasira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
