Science, Technology, and the Arts-Based School Readiness from an Educational Ecosystem Perspective: Profile of Educators and Learning in Jember Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v8i3.2556Keywords:
Schools’ Readiness, Science, Technology, The Arts, Educational Ecosystem, Teachers’ Readiness, Learning InnovationAbstract
(1) The development of Science, Technology, and the Arts encourages schools to undertake adaptive, innovative, and technology-based learning transformations. However, school readiness for implementing Science, Technology, and the Arts-based learning does not depend solely on the competence of individual educators, but also on support from the entire education ecosystem. (2) This study aims to analyze the readiness of Science, Technology, and the Arts -based schools from the perspective of the education ecosystem by examining the relationship between school institutional factors and educator readiness and its implications for learning practices in Jember Regency. (3) The study used a quantitative approach with a survey. The research sample comprised 178 educators from early childhood education, elementary, junior high, and high schools in Jember Regency. (4) The results of the study indicate that school leadership, innovation climate, availability of technology infrastructure, and support for professional development have a positive and significant effect on the readiness of Science, Technology, and the Arts -based educators. Furthermore, educator readiness has been shown to significantly affect innovative science- and technology-based learning practices. (5) These findings confirm that school readiness is the result of the interaction between structural and individual factors in an education ecosystem. In essence, strengthening Science, Technology, and the Arts -based school readiness necessitates a systemic approach that integrates transformational leadership, a culture of innovation, and ongoing professional development. This research provides an empirical contribution to the development of a school readiness model grounded in Science, Technology, and the Arts within the educational context of the Jember district.
References
Adha, C., Fadilla, S., & Muhammad, N. (2024). Pentingnya Strategi Pembelajaran Efektif Yang Berpusat Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v2i1.539
Alifah, I. N., Prihandono, T., & Bektiarso, S. (2025). Integrasi IPTEK untuk Meningkatkan Inovasi Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum Merdeka : Tantangan dan Strategi Transformasi Pendidikan. Jourrnal of Education Research, 6(4), 1052–1057. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i4.2099
Ambarwati, D., Wibowo, U. B., Arsyiadanti, H., & Susanti, S. (2022). Studi Literatur: Peran Inovasi Pendidikan pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Digital. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v8i2.43560
Arifin, Sulkifly, & Yusuf, S. R. (2023). Information and Communication Technology-Based Learning Management in Improving Learning Quality Services in the Digital Era. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_59
Belva Saskia Permana, Lutvia Ainun Hazizah, & Yusuf Tri Herlambang. (2024). Teknologi Pendidikan: Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Di Era Digitalisasi. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 4(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i1.2702
Burhan, B., Nurwidyayanti, N., Irwandi, A., Shaleh, N. F., Pabulo, K., & Rahmadhanningsih, S. (2023). Analisis Penerapan Manajemen Sekolah Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem, 23(2), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.35965/eco.v23i2.2889
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Eliza, D., Sriandila, R., Fitri, D. A. N., & Yenti, S. (2022). Membangun Guru yang Profesional melalui Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru dalam Penerapan Profesinya. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 5362–5369. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2878
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fadliansyah, M. R., & Hindun. (2023). Analisis Penggunaan IPTEK dalam Pembelajaran Kurirkulum Merdeka Sebagai Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Fonologi: Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 1(4), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v1i4.169
Fauzia, R., & Hadikusuma Ramadan, Z. (2023). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Educatio, 9(3), 1608–1617. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i3.5323
Fauziyah, N., & El Yunusi, M. (2024). Strategi Pembelajaran Efektif dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa di SD Bahreisy Surabaya. Golden Age and Inclusive Education, 1(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.61798/galon.v1i2.124
Firrizkiyah, I., Rizal, Wilade, S., Nashrullah, & Bulalong, R. R. (2026). Transformational School Leadership and Quality Management Practices : Insights from a Public Primary School in Indonesia. Journal Of Innovation and Research In Primary Education, 5(2), 2747–2756. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i2.3626
Handayani, W., Hidayat, S., & Elan. (2025). Transformational Leadership of School Principals as a Catalyst for Digital Learning Implementation in Primary Schools. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(3), 1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1826
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Indonesia, P. R. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Indonesia, P. R. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen .
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:120383522
Lestari, Y. E., Pudin, Y. A., & Wibowo, V. M. (2024). The Impact of Digital Learning Policies on Educational Equity in Rural Indonesian Schools. International Journal of Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(2), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijeepa.v1i2.74
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 1-55.
Mardiana, E., Kusuma, Z. N., & Iskandar, S. (2024). Karakteristik dan Peran Guru sebagai Fasilitator Pembelajaran Abad 21 di Sekolah Dasar. Pendas:Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 09(4). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i4.20988
Maryani, E. (2022). Pendidikan profesi guru (PPG) sebagai cara untuk menjadikan guru menjadi profesional. GUAU: Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru Agama Islam, 2, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v15i1.65200
Maulana, I., Rahma, N. A., Mahfirah, N. F., Alfarizi, W., & Darlis, A. (2023). Meningkatkan Profesional Guru dengan Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG). Journal on Education, 5(2), 2158–2167. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.867
Maullidina, K., Mulyani, E. S., & Atikah, C. (2023). Pengaruh Profesionalisme Guru terhadap Kualitas Pendidikan. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 1731–1736. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.519
Misbahul Arifin, Abdul Rahman, & Ravik Karsidi. (2024). Dampak Pengembangan Teknologi Asistif terhadap Layanan Pendidikan Berbasis IPTEK bagi Individu Tunanetra. JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 13(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v13i1.73684
Muhaimin, Asrial, Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020). Science Teachers ’ Integration of Digital Resources in Education : A Survey in Rural Areas of One Indonesian Province. Heliyon, 6(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04631
Ni’matussyahara, D., Sugiyanto, S., & Sarwono, S. (2023). Interactive Digital Media Based on Our-Space Website in Geography Learning : ICT, Media Skills, and Learning Styles. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(4), 1230. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i4.9198
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ofita, C. S. (2023). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Abad 21 : Tinjauan Peran Guru Menghadapi Generasi Alpha. Jurnal Tata Kelola Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.17509/jtkp.v5i2.64847
Pramesti, E., Wardany, K., & Rigianti, H. A. (2023). Pengaruh Kinerja Guru Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 6(2), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v6i2.541
Pratama, I. G. (2024). Kunci Sukses Pembelajaran Efektif : Tinjauan Sistematic Literature Review Memahami Hubungan Gaya Kognitif,Regulasi Diri, dan Motivasi. Psycho Aksara, 2(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.28926/pyschoaksara.v2i1.1422
Putri Husma, M. J., Shaleh, S., & Handayani, T. (2023). Profil Guru Profesional di Era Industri 5.0. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(2), 672. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i2.2053
Rivalina, R., & Sudirman Siahaan. (2020). Pemanfaatan TIK ke dalam Pembelajaran: Ke arah pembelajaran berpusat pada peserta didi. Jurnal Teknodik, 24(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.121
Rosa, E., Destian, R., & Agustian, A. (2024). Inovasi Model dan Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal of Education Research, 21(3), 2608–2617. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1153
Sitepu, E. N. (2021). Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Digital. Mahesa, 1(1), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.34007/ppd.v1i1.195
Susilo, D. P., Stevanus, K., & Yulia, T. (2023). Kinerja Pendidik Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran David Priyo Susilo 1. Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup, 5(2), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.38189/jtbh.v5i2.398
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D (19th ed.). Alfabeta,cv, Bandung.
Teig, N., & Nilsen, T. (2022). Profiles of instructional quality in primary and secondary education: Patterns, predictors, and relations to student achievement and motivation in science. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74(May), 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170
Ulansari, L. U., Hayat, A., Lastiti, N., & Anggraeni, V. (1856). Inovasi Sekolah Berbasis Tekhnologi Informasi dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Kejuruan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 3(11), 1851–1856.
Yli-Pietilä, R., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2024). Profiles of teacher’s professional agency in the classroom across time. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(5), 954–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2196536
Warsono. (2017). Guru: Antara Pendidik, Profesi, dan Aktor Sosial. The Journal of Society & Media, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v1n1.p1-10
Widyawati, E. R., & Sukadari. (2023). Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi sebagai Alat Pembelajaran Kekinian bagi Guru Profesional IPS dalam Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter Menyongsong Era Society 5.0. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 10, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v10i.667
Wijaya, L. (2023). Peran Guru Profesional Untuk Meningkatkan Standar Kompetensi Pendidikan. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(6), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i6.27
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angraeny Unedia, Fitri Amilia, Anita Fatimatul Laeli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
