Educational Supervision with Scientific Methods in Improving Student Learning Outcomes and the Performance of High-Achieving Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v8i2.2325Keywords:
Educational Supervision, Scientific Method, Learning Outcomes, High-Achieving Teacher PerformanceAbstract
The implementation of educational supervision with scientific methods in improving student learning outcomes and the performance of outstanding teachers at the elementary education unit level in Rejang Lebong Regency includes problems that occur, namely the implementation of educational supervision is rarely carried out so that it results in the teaching and learning process not being in accordance with the provisions and not achieving learning objectives, this decreases student learning outcomes and decreases teacher performance so that the purpose of this study is to provide knowledge and concepts about the importance of implementing educational supervision using scientific methods in improving student learning outcomes as well as improving teacher performance so that teachers achieve at the educational unit level. The research methodology used is using case studies, namely to explore in depth several phenomena that are located in a natural context, of course educational supervision activities that have been carried out at the educational unit level and data collection techniques used are interviews, observation and documentation through the stages of problem identification, case selection, data collection, case studies, data analysis, data organization, and presentation of data results. The research results have found that the implementation of educational supervision using scientific methods is rarely carried out at the educational unit level, this reduces student learning outcomes and teacher performance, resulting in the lack of achievement of educational goals, so the recommendation given by researchers is that it is important to carry out educational supervision activities using scientific methods on an ongoing basis in the form of seeing the extent to which student learning outcomes are achieved and improving teacher performance so that teachers can become high-achieving teachers in Rejang Lebong Regency.
References
Birkeli, C. N., & Rø, K. I. (2023). Educational supervisor's perceptions of their role in supporting residents' learning: a qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Education, 14, 178‑186. https://doi.org/10.14740/ijome1008123
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). Aldine Publishing.
Erdem, C. (2024). A comparative meta-analysis of the effects of problem-based learning model on K–12 students’ cognitive outputs. Educational Studies, 50(6), 1498–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.210365
Fatkhan. (2021, May 3). Model‑model dalam supervisi pendidikan. Diakses dari https://fatkhan.web.id/model-model-dalam-supervisi-pendidikan/
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Gus, G. G. (1998). Professional learning and development through supervision. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(5), 483‑503.
Glover, T. A., Reddy, L. A., & Crouse, K. (2023). Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 96, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006
Hilhamsyah, H., Azahar, R., & Handika, P. S. (2025). Enhancing teacher professionalism through educational supervision: A literature review in Indonesian context. Edusoshum: Journal of Islamic Education and Social Humanities, 5(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.52366/edusoshum.v5i2.176
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth.
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Koçoğlu, A., & Kanadlı, S. (2025). The effect of problem-based learning approach on learning outcomes: A second-order meta-analysis study. Educational Research Review, 48, 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.10069
Kukulska‑Hill, A. (2020). Technology‑enhanced supervision. Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 45‑58.
Mertler, C. A. (2017). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (6th ed.). Routledge.
Regassa, T. E., & Mamo, T. R. (2024). A systematic review: Educational supervision in different countries from instructional improvement perspective. Science Research, 12(4), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20241204.13
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(1), 16‑20.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Mulyasa, E. (2003). Teknik-teknik supervisi dalam pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sahertian, H. (2000). Supervisi pendidikan: Teori dan praktik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77‑101.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.
Mulyasa, E. (2003). Manajemen kelas: Teori & praktik (2nd ed.). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Sun, D. (2022). The effectiveness of formative assessment for enhancing reading achievement in K–12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 990196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196
Yao, Y., Amos, M., Snider, K., & Brown, T. (2024). The impact of formative assessment on K–12 learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 29(7–8), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2363831
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Emmi Kholilah Harahap, Sumarto Sumarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
